So here’s what I don’t get. LLMs were trained on data from places like SO. SO starts losing users ,and thus content. Content that LLMs ingest to stay relevant.
So where will LLMs get their content after a certain point? Especially for new things that may come out or unique situations. It’s not like it’ll scrape the answer from a web page if people are just asking LLMs.
WSL2 now supports WSLg which allows you to run X11 (or other graphics packages) natively now.
So besides the brownie points, im curious what having it open sourced will benefit. Not like you can fork it to run on a different OS. You can make some extensions but to do what? You can’t really tie it further in to the host OS unless you know of some undocumented Win32 APIs.
Maybe im just not thinking creatively enough.
I frequent ani.social quite often too. I’ve watched too many shows I stopped counting and guess what…. I prefer dubs gasp! So they’re not for children. It’s just a matter of preference and I love how the localizations are getting better rather than just rote translation (more gasps!)
Which what type of device? He’s talking about a Windows PC. I’m sure on the Apple TV device Apple TV+ works just fine.
There’s a dub for it if you don’t like reading subs.
You remember the taste of eating ass? Got it.
This is one of those “technically correct” responses. The issue is Epic has developed Fortnite for a global release cadence to ensure it doesn’t have a fractured experience. Since Apple is blocking the US, they don’t want to release it in the EU and deal with multiple versions.
Yes
So what you’re saying is it should be their choice? Feel like there’s a phrase for that.
If they really want customers back
Please explain how then? (Hint: it’s not)
But what good is your own instance if there’s no content?
Airplanes usually operate on the order of decades. The 747-8 was made between 2012 and 2023, so it’s still a relatively new plane depending on when it was delivered initially.
Airplane designs are constantly being updated just because the shape doesn’t have to be. Case in point, though developed in 1963, the latest generation of 747 (the 747-8i) started being delivered in 2012, with the last one in 2023, which is still relatively recent in airplane years.
For another example the B-52 was first introduced in 1955, but is on its 10th generation (B-52J) with updates to avionics as of 2020. So it doesn’t take much to find a good design and then just keep iterating and updating it.
To vintage’s point. The way I view it is there is no chance for AGI via the current method of hopped up LLM/ML but that doesn’t mean we won’t uncover a method in the future. Bio-engineering with an attempt to recreate a neural network for example, or extraction of neurons via stem cells with some sort of electrical interface. My initial point was that it’s way off, not that it’s impossible. One day someone will go “well, that’s interesting” and we’ll have a whole new paradigm
I know someone with a Juno.com email address.
This is why AGI is way off and any publicly trained models will ultimately fail. Where you’ll see AI actually be useful will be tightly controlled, in house or privately developed models. But they’re gonna be expensive and highly specialized as a result.
Is that a bike lane on what is basically a highway?!