Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
9
Comments
555
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Non voters cannot be counted as objectors or supporters.

    We don't have to count them as anything.

  • 72% is actually a huge turnout compared to pretty much any vote in the last 50 years

    That doesn't contradict anything I said.

    As such they must be assumed to divide as the vote was.

    This is a non sequitur.

    Regardless, OP was talking about votes explicitly.

  • linux culture

    snigger

    you're teaching newbies the wrong lessons

    The problem is not that it's teaching bad lessons, it's that it's actually doing bad things.

    most people can parse that they're essentially asking you to run some commands at a url

    I know not to take it completely literally

    Then it needn't be written literally.

    I think you're giving the authors of such installation instructions too much credit. I think they intend people to take it literally. I think this because I've argued with many of them.

  • Saved that, thank you.

  • You have the option of piping it into a file instead, inspecting that file for yourself and then running it, or running it in some sandboxed environment.

    That's not what projects recommend though. Many recommend piping the output of an HTTP transfer over the public Internet directly into a shell interpreter. Even just

     
        
    curl https://... > install.sh; sh install.sh
    
    
      

    would be one step up. The absolute minimum recommendation IMHO should be

     
        
    curl https://... > install.sh; less install.sh; sh install.sh
    
    
      

    but this is still problematic.

    Ultimately, installing software is a labourious process which requires care, attention and the informed use of GPG. It shouldn't be simplified for convenience.

    Also, FYI, the word "option" implies that I'm somehow restricted to a limited set of options in how I can use my GNU/Linux computer which is not the case.

  • How do I know the maintainers of the repo haven't gone rogue and are now distributing malware?

    Depends on the repo but at least for Debian, there's a path of trust between GPG keys I've signed and the Debian release GPG keys.

  • How is that safe?

    It's not, it's a sign that the authors don't take security seriously.

    If you use this

    I never do.

  • your repeated assertion that it is poorly engineered simply because it doesn't use a particular distros packaging system

    I have asserted no such thing.

  • To me it's irrelevant

    I think that's the crux of the issue. You've conflated your interests and the author's purposes.

  • You didn't answer my question.

  • The article is about the couple being fined for finding the stowaway after they left the port, the gender, age and reason the stowaway came to the UK is irrelevant to that.

    Why do you believe the gender and age were included in the article?

  • Pro-tip: share text as text, not as images.

  • they could have left it out and it wouldn't have changed anything

    LOL, it would have changed the article.

  • Why is it relevant to the article about where he came from?

  • Because that's not the focus of the article

    They went to the trouble of explaining the age of the boy and where he was from and by your logic those bits of information aren't the focus of the article either.

    You're just guessing, you don't know. We can all make guesses.

  • the current crisis

    What are you referring to?

  • Not the EU.

  • Bizarre that the article doesn't address the reasons why the boy wanted to come to the UK. As per usual.

  • a margin of error

    What do you mean?

    You know what they meant

    Yes and I responded appropriately.