You’re not going to bother to point out the fault in my logic?

maybe i have never been in proper situations

Indeed. More information on proper communication for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization

You’re going out of your way to create a problem that doesn’t exist.

The problem does exist, that’s why you’re making suggestions about how to work around the problem. I’ve been confused before by people using “they” as a pronoun in exactly this sense. I’m not going out of my way to create a problem, it’s a problem that I’ve experienced IRL. Please don’t try to invalidate my experience.

If you just don’t respect people’s identity then admit you’re bigoted instead of hiding behind faulty logic.

You’re jump to conclusions.

I don’t understand what you’re trying to express. I can’t make sense of what you’ve written.

You don’t use the person’s name every time when you’re talking about them in their presence.

Those who appreciate polite behaviour do.

it is fairly common to use the third person pronoun of someone during a group conversation, even while they are there

But is improper to do so. The proper way to refer to a person who is present is by using their name.

“I was with Dan (they/them) and Steve the other day. They hadn’t brought a poster they needed and went back to the car to get it.”

This demonstrates the semantic problem with using “they” as a pronoun: it isn’t clear who went back to the car, (1) just Dan or (2) both Dan and Steve. Nor is it clear who needed the poster and who hadn’t brought it.

Fealty

less functionality than a smartphone

Tablet is just a bigger screen

A bigger screen is more functionality.

warned

LOL

Will Supposedly Fix the Climate

Uhh… wut?

You’re not making sense.

This is OK

This is not OK.

Blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of cyclists if they’re too stupid and impatient to wait a few seconds.

Not blocking a cycle path impacts the safety of Amazon drivers if they’re too stupid and impatient to walk a few seconds.

you piece of shit sociopath

U seem angry bro.

You can’t be fucking bothered to wait a few seconds. That’s literally a complaint about convenience.

Blocking a cyclepath impacts the safety of cyclists. And yet:

no matter how many times you hear the consequences you put on the health and safety of other people, your fucking spoiled entitlement and positioning your humanity over others causes you to interpret it as “convenience.”

You’re projecting.

The obvious implication of setting your own convenience above someone else’s health and safety is that you think you’re above them.

Setting their own convenience above everyone else’s health and safety is what these Amazon drivers have done.

they want all the consequences to fall on the people ‘lower’ than them. Fuck them.

Nobody here has used the word “lower”, you’ve conjured that word up. Do you think perhaps you might be projecting?

It is a political tool …

What is?

national narrative

WTF is that?

in this case, we know it’s not because they got rid of that option. Why? Because the task is infeasible to support.

You’re not making any sense.

the devs no longer offer it as a supported method

Are you saying that the Home Assistant developers used to support distro packages?

No one is saying it is impossible

OP is saying that. They said it was “infeasible”.