F-Zero X for N64 is, for me, the pinnacle of racing games (works great on emulation).
It's fast, smooth, and pretty straightforward. It even had a random map mode --- they were sometimes a bit funky, but it was fun when you wanted something new.
your faith was proven wrong with both masks and toilet paper being bought for resale at predatory prices, or just to maintain personal supplies at the expense of everyone else.
That's a fallacy/faulty generalization --- I'm not saying everyone behaves well, but from my experience, the vast majority do. The pandemic for me was a time where I really felt like we looked out for our fellow people, at least locally.
NOTE: The script is broken, DO NOT ATTEMPT TO USE THE SCRIPT NOW. Attempting to run it may get your account flagged stopping you from trying face verification either temporarily or permanently, forcing you to use your ID.
That's exactly my point, there are two different colloquial ways of talking about angles. I am not claiming there is a mathematical inconsistency.
Colloquially, a "triangle has 180 degrees" and a "circle has 360 degrees." Maybe that's different in different education systems, but certainly in the US that's how things are taught at the introductory level.
The sum of internal angles for a regular polygon with n sides is (n-2)×pi. In the limit of n going to infinity, a regular polygon is a circle. From above it's clear that the sum of the internal angles also goes to infinity (wheres for n=3 it's pi radians, as expected for a triangle).
There is no mystery here, I am just complaining about sloppy colloquial language that, in my opinion, doesn't foster good geometric intuition, especially as one is learning geometry.
If you take a circle to be the limit of a polygon as the number of sides goes to infinity, then you have infinite interior angles, with each angle approaching 180deg, as the edges become infinitely short and approach being parallel. The sum of the angles is infinite in this case.
If you reduce this to three sides instead of infinite, then you get a triangle with a sum of interior angles of 180deg which we know and love.
On the other hand, any closed shape (Euclidean, blah blah), from the inside, is 360deg basically by definition.
Circle, "has 360 degrees," the sum of the interior angles is infinite.
(I'm not actually confused, it's just that "a circle has 360 degrees" and "a triangle has 180 degrees" is a little annoying in that they use different definitions.)
...now, why Seattle-Tacoma International Airport and an intercardinal direction are playing each other is anybody's guess. Maybe one of the runways has a nasty NorthEasterly crosswind?
Or, malicious compliance by someone with a moral compass. Best is to somehow leak documents wholesale. But if that's not possible, I think the next best way to all but guarantee that the information gets out is to do a lousy job censoring, and let "The Internet" do the rest. It also makes the administration look even more stupid, especially in the eyes of technically minded folks.
But yeah, not the best and brightest, that's certainly a possibility.
F-Zero X for N64 is, for me, the pinnacle of racing games (works great on emulation).
It's fast, smooth, and pretty straightforward. It even had a random map mode --- they were sometimes a bit funky, but it was fun when you wanted something new.