Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
Posts
1
Comments
93
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • Well just wait until you find out about mili then 🙏

  • Everything I said is true and you didn't refute any of it.

    When you order beef and the waiter brings chicken, you point out the mistake. When the waiter bites your nose, what do you do?

    This is a leftist space. Debunking is something done in general forums, when you're trying to inform the audience. No one here is gonna waste their precious time debunking any of that for the 100th time lol

  • I want to argue that there was no reason to recommend him before. Nothing will change my mind that Manufacturing Consent (1988) was written to distract from Inventing Reality (1986). Only one of those books has a dedicated Wikipedia page, and it's not the one written by the communist.

  • Thank you, I enjoyed reading it

  • Trying to register, but I can't read a thing in Chinese :/

  • Thank you. I'll definitely be reading it this year.

  • One of those texts cites Revolutionary Education: Theory and Practice for Socialist Organizers. Have you read that book too? What are your thought on it?

  • All hoxhaist parties are like that. I'm often disappointed with Unidade Popular pelo Socialismo here in Brazil, for the same reason. That said, they are not entirely useless either. They do a lot of organizing, including violent resistance at times. And they heavily promote reading classic marxist theory. I think it's important for us to criticize the mistakes of their political line, but the name calling, shallow criticism I often see is not ✨ dialectical ✨ (and tbh they also do that a lot)

    I don't know a single thing about the American Party of Labor, though, except for procapra@lemmy.ml saying they are hoxhaists.

  • Copyright, patents, closed software, all of that are tools of the burgeoisie and should be (eventually) abolished.

  • I don't know much about Rust, but from the discussion here, I get that it only has one compiler implementation and that it can't be verified. So anything compiled with it is, technically, not fully verifiable. It doesn't matter if the compiler I have on my computer is exactly the same as the one provided by the Rust devs (which is what checksums do), if the one provided by them is already tampered with.

  • Your technical prowess in seemingly unrelated topics never ceases to amaze me, comrade.

  • No problem. I hope I can finish the current list so as to be able to contribute at least with feedback.

  • Essentially, I think any revolutionary needs to actively train and prepare for revolution, not just simple organizing. I also want anyone to be able to follow this list, urban or rural, global south or global north, and take away core skills for self-sufficiency, community organizing, and better surviving the day to day both pre-revolution and during revolution.

    Fucking yes, please! =D

    I also liked the idea of having two lists. Like a first semester, second semester of college thing.

  • I'll have that in mind going forward, thank you :) Though I still think it might be a good idea to write a couple sentences in the comments, just like you did here. "The article is a great illustration of the power dynamics between the empire and the vassals" would've been perfect. But of course I'm in no place at all to demand such a thing, please don't take it that way.

    I'm also still adapting to this space and I understand things work differently here, which is something I do appreciate.

  • I agree with everything you said. My comment was strictly about posting such an article without any discussion, any comment, just a link to it. If feels like posting "shit reactionaries say" outside its proper space. But to be clear, since my short comment was certainly unclear, my problem was not with discussing such article, just with posting them without any commentary whatsoever.

  • We posting Wall Street Journal? =( I get that the "news" is funny but it's still liberal slop

  • Thanks! Sadly it seems pretty much inactive. One post a year.