Ok? They do that anyway. Sometimes people leave and they have to hire externally.

Social democrats want some social elements in a capitalist mode of production, democratic socialists want socialised ownership of the means of production but are only willing to use bourgeois elections to achieve it.

China is strategically investing and they don’t care about Africa, only China

Yes, sure, it’s not altruistic. But there’s a huge difference between non-violent trade relationships which benefit one party more, and also benefit the other party, just less, and purposefully ensuring that an entire continent is in a constant state of civil war and desperate poverty so you can extract the maximum amount of resources through slavery. China’s foreign policy is absolutely for its own benefit but they’re taking a “rising tide lifts all boats” approach there and while there are some specific things which are fair to criticise it’s way better than what other major powers are doing.

Would you be willing to cite a link to medical information regarding such issues? I’ve spent a long time looking for such things in the past and have never been able to find any evidence for what you suggest.

That’s just factually wrong. It simply takes more resources to make the same amount of protein in meat as in vegetarian foods, that doesn’t matter where in the world you live. It takes 50 times more land just to grow the feed for beef or sheep than to grow the same amount of protein in legumes.

https://www.google.com/search?q=vegetarian+protein+sources

What do you mean by “eat enough meat”? Humans don’t have a biological need to eat meat, so by definition technically everyone has “enough” meat. If you just mean in terms of fairness then sure, the global south should get a bigger share of resources, that’s clear.

No, let’s get rid of ai and meat and eat more sustainable foods.

They understand it in the same regard as the people handing out the clearances, nothing to worry about.

honestly a bit surprised he’d start a fight with the FBI like that

Obviously it’s more complicated than only this one thing, but the most compelling theory I’ve heard about it basically goes: if you want to be a prominent woman in the maga movement you have to prove that you accept that you are inferior and not threatening to the men, by playing up this extreme and debasing kind of hyper femininity. In Bed with the Right has a great episode about this and some related ideas.

Not being able to read it is technically illiteracy in that specific context, sure.

Pot, kettle, etc. I never claimed to have perfect grammar or punctuation. Your own comment could do with some revision if you think it’s so important.

As a millennial who didn’t stop using the internet in 2015 I have no problem reading this. I don’t write like that because it’s not what I’m used to, but it’s fine, it’s social media not a professional presentation, chill.

It didn’t work well in Germany when I arrived in Europe six years ago, but for the last three or so years it’s been quite good.

What kind of things does the overhead go to?

You would find yourself in all kinds of legal disputes, permits not getting approved because the wife of the owner of the expensive corporate facility is on the city council, anonymous “stories” about your facility being told to the media, higher insurance prices because you don’t have the same bargaining power, etc.

heat protection rules in Germany are actually quite weak, above 30 they have to let you wear some lighter clothing and give you water… but yeah I think over 50 would not be allowed

We already have all this stuff, stop larping as a 1337 h4x0r and go fix some bugs in your preferred xmpp client or one of those Firefox forks

• Vietnam has an ok public healthcare system given their relatively low wealth, North Korea had one until very recently, those are basically the only other non capitalist countries out there…
• the socialised healthcare systems in the rest of the world are a legacy of socialist movements, a compromise against communism, and they exist despite capitalism not because of it
• it would save money for normal people, not for the very wealthy