Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P

poopkins

@ poopkins @lemmy.world

Posts
0
Comments
349
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Your Pixel can now double up as a full Android PC with nothing more than a USB-C cable

    Jump

  • The point is that you can use your personal device instead of a secondary machine. Everything is in one spot: your local files, workspaces, sessions and settings.

    I like the idea of leaving one keyboard on my desk at home and one at the office and just carry my work in my pocket.

  • Pluralistic: "If buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing"

    Jump

  • I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or joking, since that can be hard to distill through written text, but I don't think it needs to be spelled out that property that is not for sale can in fact be stolen.

  • Plug-in hybrids use three times more fuel than manufacturers claim, analysis finds

    Jump

  • Welcome to Lemmy, it's where the morbidly obtuse congregate.

  • Microsoft's Notepad Got Pwned (They Added AI To It, So...)

    Jump

  • "Why not?" retorts Mr. Nadella, as a grin begins to form. He exchanges a meaningful look with Mr. Suleyman.

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • Every individual is different and it has nothing to do with gender. My ex-wife was a toxic, manipulative, awful person who left me with decades-long psychological trauma, but I can appreciate that comparing all women with snakes is misogynistic.

  • Almost 800 Lufthansa flights cancelled as pilots, cabin crew walk out

    Jump

  • Lufthansa lässt Nazi-Vergangenheit neu untersuchen

    Jump

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • That's an excellent analogy. Zooming out from that scenario, should we welcome the notion of being afraid of being afraid of somebody based on their skin color, because there's an inherent prejudice of them being dangerous? If so, should we be encouraging each other to vocalize these kinds of prejudices? And by extension, is it acceptable to draw sweeping conclusions about a group of people based on their generic traits?

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • Swap the word "man" for another group of people based on generic traits and continue your sweeping generalizations.

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • Those are the two options?

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • Has anybody looked into the possibility that we put down all these dangerous creatures before more people get hurt? Better safe than sorry.

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • It's not all men, it's a random man. And it's not that they are dangerous, it's about what feels riskier from a woman's perspective.

    How is that different? It's still a prejudice based on somebody's unalterable trait. The entire premise is a deliberate generalization to place men and wild animals into the same category.

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • It's ironic we're dissecting which kind of bear is dangerous, while implicitly accepting the premise that all men are dangerous.

  • ‘Manfluencers’ are filming themselves trying to pick up women using smart glasses

    Jump

  • I've always thought this is such a generalist scenario, meant to deliberately portray all men as dangerous and categorically make them look bad. Imagine we swapped out "men" for another group of people.

  • UN: 4.5 million girls at risk of genital mutilation in 2026

    Jump

  • Excellent advice for most of us here. It's ironic you should write that while I was standing on Prodalp.

  • Disney+ loses Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and 3D amid patent dispute

    Jump

  • So I'm guessing this isn't referring to the overly racist stuff from the 1940s and '50s because those weren't hit movie series. We're getting there through a process of elimination.

  • UN: 4.5 million girls at risk of genital mutilation in 2026

    Jump

  • You have for some reason decided that I disagree with you, but I've not. I've only tried to point out the escape hatch for proponents of mutilation to argue for, and why the comment that you originally replied to is not "whataboutism."

  • UN: 4.5 million girls at risk of genital mutilation in 2026

    Jump

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world wrote:

    Wrong, bitch.

    You seem terribly upset, but there's no need for name-calling. Nobody is "delegitimizing" anything here except what you are making of others inputs to the discourse.

    For what it's worth, we both agree mutilation is wrong and should be prohibited, so there's really no reason to be so angry and childish in the first place.

  • Disney+ loses Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and 3D amid patent dispute

    Jump

  • That's great and all, but I'm only trying to understand the opinion you put forward in your original comment.