You don't even need to ban it. You just need to open up the marketplace to alternatives. Cory Doctrow has been pushing the idea that the best retaliation is to simply repeal anti-circumvention laws and allow companies to begin chipping away at the walled gardens of the tech giants. For example, John Deere famously puts software locks on its tractors so that even simple repairs require the owner to pay for a technician to come out and "authorize" the newly installed part or else the machine will refuse to start. This system could almost certainly be bypassed, but right now the law not only allows manufacturers to lock their tractors, it also forbids anyone else from unlocking them. If the EU simply repealed the law that bans circumvention then some clever EU citizen could legally reverse engineer the software running on those tractors and start a business selling unlocking software. They could make it a one-time purchase at 10x the cost of an official tech visit and make money hand over fist while still saving their customers time and money in the long term.And of course it's not just tractors. Make a third party app store for the iphone that charges half the commission of Apple. Make a tool that allows seamless account migration from Google to the independent cloud provider of your choice. A huge amount of corporate rent seeking is enabled by anti-circumvention laws.
For what its worth, Slotin in particular knew the consequences. If i recall correctly, he had a reputation for being a bit of a "cowboy" when it came to experimental protocol. I believe the lab even had specially made tools for handling the core, but Slotin insisted on using a screwdriver because it was easier.
I just wrote a quick script to check my list against the google doc. The official Merriam Webster app and the official Letterboxd app both got flagged.
The bloodletting will hit hardest in back-office operations, risk management, and compliance
Compliance? Really? They're going to put the non-deterministic halucination engines in charge of compliance?
I can only hope that the first time this goes south the regulators understand how important it is to make an example to everyone else that a company can not escape liability for their actions just because the AI system that took those actions wasn't explicitly instructed to do so.
Time to once again pitch my idea for a Super Smash Bros style fighting game with all public domain characters and a new DLC released every January 1st.
The cynic in me wants to say that Facebook's foray into VR was a resounding success in that it propped up their stock price until the next fad/grift could come along and take it's place.
The "manager" AI went off the rails almost immediately, and their solution was adding a "CEO" AI to supervise it. AI 'research' of this type is truly some of the most looney-tunes shit I've ever seen society take seriously.
Every time I see a headline like this I'm reminded of the time I heard someone describe the modern state of AI research as equivalent to the practice of alchemy.
Long before anyone knew about atoms, molecules, atomic weights, or electron bonds, there were dudes who would just mix random chemicals together in an attempt to turn lead to gold, or create the elixir of life or whatever. Their methods were haphazard, their objectives impossible, and most probably poisoned themselves in the process, but those early stumbling steps eventually gave rise to the modern science of chemistry and all that came with it.
AI researchers are modern alchemists. They have no idea how anything really works and their experiments result in disaster as often as not. There's great potential but no clear path to it. We can only hope that we'll make it out of the alchemy phase before society succumbs to the digital equivalent of mercury poisoning because it's just so fun to play with.
Unfortunately its my understanding from this article that the type of RAM being demanded by AI data centers isn't the same as standard DDR5 consumer memory.
I assume that means it won't be possible to directly reallocate those chips to the consumer market when the AI bubble bursts. The manufacturers will have to switch their assembly lines back to consumer chip production and then supply will slowly ramp up as those facilities come back online.
I'm hopeful that when the bubble pops it'll be more like the dot com crash, which is to say that the fallout is mostly of the economic variety rather than the superfund variety. Sure, that'll still suck in the short term. But it will ideally lead to the big players and VC firms backing away and leaving behind an oversupply of infrastructure and talent that can be soaked up at fire sale prices by the smaller, more responsible companies that are willing to stick out the downturn and do the unglamorous work of developing this technology into something that's actually sustainable and beneficial to society.
That's my naive hope. I do recognize that there's an unfortunately high probability that things won't go that way.
You say that like they havent been? The price per kWh for lithium batteries has been consistently falling for over a decade. I see no reason to believe that this tech wouldn't result in further price decreases if it could be built at scale.
Gabriel [the player character] is required to impersonate another man, Detective Mosely, and take his motorcycle rental. ... Although Mosely does not have a mustache, one of the requirements of the puzzle is nonetheless to create a fake mustache using cat hair. ... Gabriel must also steal Mosely's passport to use as ID. ... However, because Gabriel is now using a fake mustache to impersonate someone who does not have a mustache, Gabriel must use a magic marker to draw a mustache onto Mosely's passport photo.
Recall isn't a bad idea, per-se, but it's an idea that requires absolute trust between the user and the organization implementing it. The problem is that Microsoft has NOT earned that trust and seems to be getting less trustworthy by the day.
Copy pasting my reply from the last time this came up:
Check how nearby colleges and universities dispose of used assets. The state school near me maintains a very nice website where they auction off everything from lab equipment to office furniture. It's also where all their PCs go when they hit ~5 years old and come up in the IT department's refresh cycle. The only problem in my case is that they tend to auction stuff in bulk. You can get a solid machine for $50 to $100, but only if you're willing to pay $500 to $1000 for a pallet of 10.
I looked into it a while ago but I gave up on the idea after realizing how few programs can actually run on one. There's no "reverse VM" software that allows you to seamlessly combine multiple physical machines into one virtual one. Each application has to be specifically designed to take advantage of running on a cluster. If you're writing your own code, or if you have a specific project in mind that you know supports cluster computing then by all means go for it, but if you're imagining that you'd build one and use it for gaming or video editing or some other resource intensive desktop application, unfortunately it doesn't work like that.
Edit: I dug up a link to the post I made about it in /c/linux. There's some good discussion in there if you'd like to learn more https://lemmy.world/post/11528823
Check how nearby colleges and universities dispose of used assets. The state school near me maintains a very nice website where they auction off everything from lab equipment to office furniture. It's also where all their PCs go when they hit ~5 years old and come up in the IT department's refresh cycle. Only problem in my case is that they tend to auction stuff in bulk. You can get a solid machine for $50 to $100, but only if you're willing to pay $500 to $1000 for a pallet of 10.
You don't even need to ban it. You just need to open up the marketplace to alternatives. Cory Doctrow has been pushing the idea that the best retaliation is to simply repeal anti-circumvention laws and allow companies to begin chipping away at the walled gardens of the tech giants. For example, John Deere famously puts software locks on its tractors so that even simple repairs require the owner to pay for a technician to come out and "authorize" the newly installed part or else the machine will refuse to start. This system could almost certainly be bypassed, but right now the law not only allows manufacturers to lock their tractors, it also forbids anyone else from unlocking them. If the EU simply repealed the law that bans circumvention then some clever EU citizen could legally reverse engineer the software running on those tractors and start a business selling unlocking software. They could make it a one-time purchase at 10x the cost of an official tech visit and make money hand over fist while still saving their customers time and money in the long term.And of course it's not just tractors. Make a third party app store for the iphone that charges half the commission of Apple. Make a tool that allows seamless account migration from Google to the independent cloud provider of your choice. A huge amount of corporate rent seeking is enabled by anti-circumvention laws.