Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P
帖子
1
评论
242
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Current knowledge isn't worthless but it isn't necessarily what's true. Just keep an open mind about that and you might realize that you don't really know what's true. So, you don't really know if there's a creator.

    Based on your experience and rational though you believe there is no god, but you don't know. It is still a belief.

  • Yeah, that chance might be low, but we're not talking about religions here, we're talking about the existence of a god or creator.

  • I agree, we will never know if it exists or not... So why should we believe something about it?

    Isn't "I know" much better than "I believe"?

  • Yeah, that's my problem. Whatever probability they assign to it would a belief. They don't really know. As you said, everyone assigns a different probability to it, so who is right?

    Isn't just easier to accept ignorance instead of believing something that we can't even begin to understand?

  • The moment you finally install arch and your realize you still feel empty inside.

  • But do they like it when people outside of Germany do it? I just asked a question and said "I'm not sure", and still got downvoted.

  • The same people who didn't understand that Google uses a SEO algorithm to promote sites regardless of the accuracy of their content, so they would trust the first page.

    If people don't understand the tools they are using and don't double check the information from single sources, I think it's kinda on them. I have a dietician friend, and I usually get back to him after doing my "Google research" for my diets... so much misinformation, even without an AI overview. Search engines are just best effort sources of information. Anyone using Google for anything of actual importance is using the wrong tool, it isn't a scholar or research search engine.

  • I'm really confused...Are they downvoting me because Germany did not change nuclear with fossils? That's what everyone was saying in the news... I'm not European... Sorry if I'm not up to date with German politics.... It was literally a question. Lemmy is so toxic.

  • It really depends on the type of information that you are looking for. Anyone who understands how LLMs work, will understand when they'll get a good overview.

    I usually see the results as quick summaries from an untrusted source. Even if they aren't exact, they can help me get perspective. Then I know what information to verify if something relevant was pointed out in the summary.

    Today I searched something like "Are owls endangered?". I knew I was about to get a great overview because it's a simple question. After getting the summary, I just went into some pages and confirmed what the summary said. The summary helped me know what to look for even if I didn't trust it.

    It has improved my search experience... But I do understand that people would prefer if it was 100% accurate because it is a search engine. If you refuse to tolerate innacurate results or you feel your search experience is worse, you can just disable it. Nobody is forcing you to keep it.

  • It's an expression. In this context Elon is the broken clock and saying desktops should run Linux is one of the rare times he's been right about something.

  • Isn't Germany changing nuclear for fossils? That's the last I heard but I'm not up to date.

  • For large companies that serve many customers 5K per year is a drop in a bucket. If it provides their customers with a more secure experience, it is worth it.

  • Springboot is very confusing. The inheritance tree is insane, they created a class for everything, which I get.... But it is so hard to understand the whole scope their design.

  • You know you can disable the AI overview from Google, right?

  • I don't know who downvoted you but you're right. It's not possible to get there clean.

  • Could someone explain how it's possible for him to be running for president?

    Like, are there no laws against this? Is the only requirement for the person to have a pulse?

  • You haven't said a single fact. All you do is assume things and insult people who don't agree with you.