The GDP scandal was one of those I still don't know if I understand.
They were breaking all sorts of laws in the process of making them, but the videos themselves were somehow legal? And it basically came down to the hosting platforms to remove them (which idk if they ever did).
Like this was a full blown conspiracy effort. What did they think was going to happen when they released the video of any victim and the victim asks in the video of anyone is going to see it?
What fascinates me is that the Heritage Foundation seems to tolerate her dissent. Historically, party dissenters don't live long. But my guess is that the Heritage Foundation knows we are in a society where capital punishment of political enemies isn't accepted. They let Trump ramble about executing people that he doesn't like because Trump isn't ultimately important to their plans.
Yeah. I luckily got the good kind of autism where everyone calls me a genius (which anyone with above average intelligence can tell you geniusness isn't a thing). But drives women away pretty quickly due to a "Mysterious Unlikeable Trait."
That's the whole fucking point of LLMs. They can't change truthful sources of information, they can only change what information is presented to the User.
By massively pumping in billions and billions of dollars into the LLM Slop machine, it's not investing in a useless technology, it's investing in anti-intellectualism. It's entirely on purpose.
So, interestingly, some rather misguided anarchists have this idea that Project 2025 is essentially a guaranteed way to reset the country and plunge it into anarchy.
They do not tend to be the best and the brightest.
I had to look it up because I didn't believe y'all.
$755 for 64GB DDR5.
I thought I had DDR5 but I guess it's just DDR4 according to my motherboard.
Mother fucker. I could have gotten it for $200 a year ago. I'm at the point where I suggest we start taking ahem excessive action against AI companies.
The GDP scandal was one of those I still don't know if I understand.
They were breaking all sorts of laws in the process of making them, but the videos themselves were somehow legal? And it basically came down to the hosting platforms to remove them (which idk if they ever did).
Like this was a full blown conspiracy effort. What did they think was going to happen when they released the video of any victim and the victim asks in the video of anyone is going to see it?