You're absolutely correct. What struck me was the juxtaposition of a line of parents picking up their kids and a truck that's been modified to say "war" (or "raw" if you read it in a mirror)
In (I think) the 12th amendment, it states that anyone who is ineligible to run for president is also ineligible to be vice president. While it's not necessarily clear, I imagine that'd also mean that anyone ineligible to run for president would not be eligible for any position that would put them in line of succession for president
While I have no doubt they will try, suggesting that's the goal is irresponsible and demonstrates a lack of understanding. The only purpose it serves is to sow fear and uncertainty.
I suggest you read this NPR interview to learn a bit about how elections are run, and what trump is likely to try.
Here is an excerpt directly relating to this thread:
MOSLEY: So Mother Jones recently published this article by investigative journalist Ari Berman, and it raises this scenario that President Trump will use unrest as a pretext to declare martial law and even suspend the 2026 midterms. From a constitutional and legal perspective, does a president actually have the power to delay or cancel an election?
HASEN: The President has no power to do anything related to elections, much less cancel them, reschedule them. What the president can do is do things that could disrupt the election. So here's what I'm worried about - not necessarily declaring martial law - what if the president sends the National Guard into Black cities, right? Milwaukee.
I was more disappointed than I'm willing to admit when Dr Robotnik pronounced it incorrectly in Sonic 3