Hey OP, please credit the creator if you can next time!
- 17 Posts
- 27 Comments
Thank you both for the recommend, they sound very interesting.
paperemail@links.rocksto Technology@beehaw.org•I don't know who needs to hear this, but DO NOT EVER expose Jellyfin to the internet2·3 months agoThat sucks, good to know.
Looks like creating a VPN is the only option for securing jellyfin.
paperemail@links.rocksto Technology@beehaw.org•I don't know who needs to hear this, but DO NOT EVER expose Jellyfin to the internet6·3 months agoNot unless the reverse proxy adds some layer of authentication as well. Something like HTTP basic auth, or mTLS (AKA 2-way TLS AKA client certificates)
For nginx: https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/security-controls/configuring-http-basic-authentication/
so if I add a user ”john” with password “mypassword” to video.example.com, you can try adding the login as: “https://john:mypassword@video.example.com”/
Most HTTP clients (e.g. browsers) support adding login like that. I don’t know what other jellyfin clients do that.
The other option is to set up a VPN (I recommend wireguard)
You could at least mention the European Citizens’ Initiative…
paperemail@links.rocksto memes@lemmy.world•It's your father, Marty! Something's gotta be done about him!8·6 months agoCalvin? Calvin Klein?
I did not expect this great a read…
It took me a while to finish, but I am impressed by both the style and substance, and the way so many disparate subjects are combined so well in a cohesive whole.
Thanks for posting.
Is that an interrobang‽
After the first few times that’s on you bud, I’m sorry… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That makes sense as a joke, but then why does it say hotel?
I don’t think it is cropped? There doesn’t seem to be a signature or watermark or whatever on the original either.
So I guess you did your best on this one. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯