However, Trump is betting on gas. He wants to control Venezuela for the oil. This might not only cause the US to fall behind in renewable energy technology but have no market for its oil.

Eating some meat is required to get vitamin B12.

Yes, and some meat is necessary to obtain vitamin B12.

Perhaps, eating insects might be a solution.

I think you have to combine it with other foods to get a complete protein.

This is what Democrats should propose. Egypt will be given the West Bank enlarged by land equivalent to the Gaza Strip. In return, Israel will be given the Gaza Strip and land at least 3 times larger than the West Bank in the Sinai Peninsula. Some of the land will be adjacent to water so Israel can build desalination plants. The Sinai is inhospitable, and Egypt doesn’t have the technology to develop it, but Israel does. With its new land, Egypt can give it to the Palestinians, make it a state within Egypt, or whatever it wants.

Democrats have to come up with a creative solution. Think outside of the box.

First the article cites men’s attraction to breasts and waist to hip ratio as innate evolutionary selective advantages. Babies can recognize pretty faces. From https://www.calendar-canada.ca/frequently-asked-questions/can-babies-tell-if-youre-pretty

A further line of evidence relating to infants’ facial representations is infants’ preference for attractive faces. Infants 2 months of age and older will spend more time looking at attractive faces when these are shown paired with less attractive faces (Langlois et al., 1987; Samuels & Ewy, 1985).

Yet, the author claims that men’s attraction to women with hairless bodies is cultural. She is claiming that advertisement can change people’s perception of beauty. Then how did men’s perception of beauty regarding body hair originate? Did Gillette advertise that women are more attractive without pubic hair? Why has this perception persisted? Persistence is evidence of innateness. If companies including Gillette offered to pay this author and Brandeis University millions to determine how advertisement can change people’s perception of beauty, do you think they can do it? Egyptians shaved their hair to prevent lice. Are bald headed people attractive? Women began shaving their body hair after the invention of the safety razor because they were now able to do it safely. Also, fashion became more revealing.

Men find stockings on women attractive yet, women don’t wear them as often. Why can’t advertisement change this?

Evolutionists claim that attraction to earrings on women is because it indicates wealth isn’t satisfactory. Then why don’t women wear it in the nose or eyebrows?

I’ve been thinking of your hypothesis that female genitalia is an example of something hidden but is attractive to explain men’s attraction to tattoos on women only if they’re small and hidden. Breasts and genitalia are erotic. That’s the reason they’re hidden. Tattoos are not erotic. Also, why wouldn’t a large tattoo on a women’s behind be attractive? A better explanation is that men are attracted to small and hidden tattoos on women is that this doesn’t distract from a women’s body.

I believe in intelligent design. This is the belief that the universe and life was the result of an intelligent agency. The nature of the designer is unknown because science cannot determine it.

My plan is a solution to stop Israel’s aggression. What is your solution?

Yes, a computer program can be designed to gerrymander, but the US government should have companies bid for a program that would draw districts. The winning program would be subject to peer review and required to be used by all states.

Actually, there is another way to prevent gerrymandering, proportional representation. However, I think using a computer program is better.

Like the Battle of France, there are solutions to prevent gerrymandering if people are willing to try them.

I posted the link; you didn’t have to spend time looking for the article.

The article said that women also find a hairless body more feminine and attractive. Also, the rise of feminism didn’t change this. This suggests that it’s innate. The author believes in evolution. Consequently, he attempts to reconcile a contradiction. Female body hair indicates a girl has reached puberty and can reproduce. Therefore, it would seemingly be a selective advantage for men to be attracted to body hair on women. He explains the contradiction by saying that society is the cause. As I pointed out above, the explanation is wanting. Also, if there is an evolutionary advantage for men liking body hair on women, why would a patriarchal society want women to remove body hair? Since I believe that humans were created, I can simply say that humans were designed to find women without body hair more attractive just as humans were designed to find earrings on women attractive.

You dislike the Totenkopf tattoo on Platner because of its meaning but if you were an employer, how would you know what tattoos are offensive? Platner said that he didn’t know Totenkopf was a Nazi symbol. It would be simpler for an employer to have employees cover up tattoos at least for upfront employees.

Yes, whether men’s preference for no body hair on women is innate or cultural would require further scientific studies.

Yes, there is no direct relationship between men’s feeling towards tattoos and body hair on women, but it could indicate that men prefer looking at plain skin on women.

You explained that most men finding tattoos on women attractive if there’re small and hidden is because some things are attractive if hidden. Then there should be nothing wrong with employers requiring women to hide tattoos since they’re attractive only if hidden. Employers are stricter towards up front personnel regarding dress code because they give people an impression of the company. Employers would probably say nothing about tattoos for employees working in nonvisible positions such as stock clerk. Actually, up front men would be required to cover tattoos. You would not tolerate all tattoos. Graham Platner, the Democratic candidate for Senator from Maine was criticized for having a tattoo of Totenkopf, a Nazi symbol. He had it covered up.

What is your plan?

Incorrect. I presented a survey which said that most men find tattoos on women attractive if they are small and in hidden locations. There is no requirement to give a reason. The article didn’t give a reason.

There is something they can do; push Democrats to promote having a computer program draw Congressional districts, but no one seems interested in this idea. Reminds me of the Battle of France. The French military was shocked when Germany attacked through the Ardennes Forest, an area it thought was impassable to tanks. One French officer suggested that all exits from the Ardennes be mined. Another had a simpler solution, start cutting down the trees in the Ardennes. Neither suggest was followed and France considered one of the most powerful countries in the world surrendered in 6 weeks.

This is the correct move otherwise right-wing parties will gain power and impose harsher anti-migrant laws.

This is what Europe should propose to Putin. Russia will withdraw from all land it seized from Ukraine after the 2022 invasion. NATO would be dissolved and replaced with a European alliance. Ukraine and Canada would be permitted to join but not the US. All sanctions against Russia will be lifted. Russia will not be required to pay reparations. If Putin doesn’t accept the proposal, the UK and France would send troops to Ukraine.

The US won’t agree to that. The US is considering fusing its weapons development with Israel. It’s one of the topics currently in this community.

Intelligent design simply believes that the universe and life was created by an intelligent agency. There are no religious texts. When women didn’t have the equipment or time to shave, they didn’t. Removing body hair enhances a women’s sexuality but is not required for eroticism no more than makeup or perfume.

The topic is whether men find tattoos on women attractive not evidence for intelligent design.

How do you plan for this embargo to work? The US won’t go along. The US is considering a military agreement with Israel regarding the development of weapons.

The Brandeis study indicated that most men find body hair on women unattractive. This suggests that men innately find body hair on women unattractive. There is no genetic lottery, the dice are loaded.

Your hypothesis that the attractiveness of tattoos on women is that they are hidden is plausible but is counter intuitive since something beautiful would seemingly want to be shown such as earrings on women.

You contradict your own hypothesis that tattoos are attractive on women if they’re hidden. Consequently, you should have no problem with employers telling employees to cover their tattoos.