I'm not religious, but I can see the immense value that religion had historically as an imperfect guide to ethics and practical knowledge.
Sure, we can scoff at the hypocrisy and flaws now with our years of schooling, but the common person didn't have the same access to academia back them. Short, memorable stories that show people getting punished for misdeeds and others rewarded for positive deeds is much easier to impart onto peasants than the nuances of collectivism.
Someone could point to the horrible acts done in the name of religion, but just imagine if those people didn't have the fear of god in them. Tribalism would have separated humans into different nonreligious groups to genocide in a world without religion.
Is it specific to a field or region? I'm in grad school right now, and at every stage it's always been APA (American Psychological Association) citation format.
When I was in high school I made a .bat file that autoran when you put it in a device. All it would do is open the disc drive every 90 seconds however it did convince one teacher that she had a virus which caused giggles all around.
Not the OC but the problem I have is in just one private citizen's ability to influence so much military power. While historically this isn't new and in this case it does overall good, I think that this kind of thing is a slippery slope that eventually could lead to billionaires funding wars to manipulate market elements for profit.
That would look fierce parked diagonally 8 standard-sized parking stalls and 2 handicap stalls.