32% is a weird number. It's a relief that it's not higher, but still sad that over 50,000 Americans want to do a genocide. Not just supporting another country, but actively doing it ourselves.
That's the problem though--any "AI" health bot is trained on existing data, and that's created from a long history of biased, religious, prejudiced health professionals. And assuming the bots are trained on as much data as possible, they might even be worse, because older data will be that much more biased and prejudiced.
Also, in this case, Bill Gates is full of shit. AI will be nowhere near sophisticated enough in 10 years to do most jobs.
Even more apparent is when you draw the parallel to birth defects, diseases, or literally any reason we affect our bodies.
Pretty much all bigots don't realize it. There are almost no Bond villains in real life--humans can't really exist in a state where they truly believe they're the "bad guy." Some people know they're wrong, but they see themselves as a victim, not a villain.
Not only do they not recognize their bigotry, they believe themselves to be the "good guys" in this situation, with opinions on other people ranging from condescending pity to complete disregard.
And things like this do way more than just the immediate apparent impact. Every time a white cis guy speaks out like this, it helps to break down the lie that this bigoted way of thinking is the majority.
If you're genuinely curious, I can give you a glimpse into their rationality (though I strongly disagree with it).
Say, for just a brief moment, that you consider trans people to be mentally ill. Calling them by their preferred pronouns would be like giving a drink to an alcoholic--you'd be encouraging it, which would be to their detriment. And worse, you'd be liable to whatever diety might be displeased with your actions that caused someone else to continue in their sin.
Of course, that only works if you have a very poor understanding of both gender and theology. The real reason the bigots don't like trans people is because it challenges their worldview, which is uncomfortable. And instead of facing that head on, they'd rather try to justify their current view.
No, every person on that chat (other than the editor from the Atlantic) should lose their clearance and be fired. They were all using an unapproved, off-record system for discussing matters of national security. They are all responsible.
I generally blame the instructors when that happens. I've taken classes on the most menial subjects that were great because the instructor was great. Almost anything can be enjoyable to learn if you have the right teacher.
32% is a weird number. It's a relief that it's not higher, but still sad that over 50,000 Americans want to do a genocide. Not just supporting another country, but actively doing it ourselves.