Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)O
Posts
1
Comments
15
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Hey mate thanks for writing all that down. Gives me a few ideas - in particular how NNTP could fit in to the equation.

    LKML can be accessed by a usenet client at nntp.lore.kernel.org. In theory, then, it should be possible to at least read both LKML and ActivityPub stuff hosted at the same NNTP server. To get that working means making sure all the conversion and mapping of concepts are as clean as possible. It's a good test!

    Thanks again!

  • Don't tempt me :D

  • I'd much rather have this put in front of LKML than the terrible interface they have right now.

    Interesting. Could you go into this a bit more? Do you mean for example being able to use the Lemmy web UI to read LKML?

  • Oh wow awesome. Thanks so much!

    It needs a bit more fleshing out, removing a bit of hardcoding too. And of course I want to publishit under an open source licence too. Thanks for the tip - I've written it down in the growing TODO file! :)

  • This is interesting, but have you considered porting to Usenet?

    Yes that's on the list! Now that I have a whole bunch of RFC822 files, (in Maildirs) I can also serve them over read-only NNTP. This was the original goal actually - I like the idea of using the simpler protocol NNTP over IMAP to read stuff.

  • The alternative is something like FediSeer where you can get sites guaranteed by others and block anything not given the all-clear, but that really harms the ability for new sites to appear.

    If something like this were to gain lots of traction I'd hope it would be something not too difficult to implement by smaller new sites.

    What really sucks is the situation with email now: it's really tricky to get stuff delivered if you're not Google/Microsoft. The barrier to entry is way, way too high :(

  • The alternative is something like FediSeer where you can get sites guaranteed by others and block anything not given the all-clear, but that really harms the ability for new sites to appear.

    If something like this were to gain lots of traction I'd hope it would be something not too difficult to implement by smaller new sites.

    What really sucks is the situation with email now: it's really tricky to get stuff delivered if you're not Google/Microsoft. The barrier to entry is way, way too high :(

  • And ofc the extra spicy sms bridge where an AI gives you an executive summary of your memes for the day

    needs more crypto

  • UNSUBSCRIBE

    ;)

  • UNSUBSCRIBE

    ;)

  • Thanks for replying from friendica! Confirming message received OK :)

  • Does it also send you an update of how many upvotes you get?

    Well, I receive the corresponding ActivityPub "Like"s from the servers. But right now I just drop the message. I suppose that could turn into a mail message with a body like "user X liked your post" or something, but that doesn't feel like a natural mapping to me.

    I'm also one of those people that hides upvote & boost counts in my Mastodon app ;)

  • Oh I stopped and thought whether I should. The answer was "probably not" every time...

  • Excuse my ignorance but how will the fediverse defend itself against email spam?

    That's a good question. Right now there's very little stopping people from spinning up some ActivityPub server and blasting out messages. I'm actually surprised at how little ActivityPub spam there is currently.

    One of the awesome things about the fediverse is how anti-commercial it is right now. Maybe it's not a major target for spam because there's not a lot of money in it.

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Weird idea continues connecting fediverse and email