This only guarantees your WANip:8100 will map to 192.168.0.113:81, and doesn’t address whether or not dns resolution is correct. I would also be weary of using port numbers on wikipedia’s known ports list, as some ISPs will filter those upstream. The last thing is that your router may not want to hairpin that traffic, so if you’re not coming in from the outside it might not be a valid test.
*All the slavers
Wish the AMA would get their shit together and do the same
Yeah, not the best case, but probably the best we could hope for given the alternatives and that they were literally fleeing into the crowd.
You’re thinking about the voting problem wrong, specifically not including all of the requirements
The algorithm isn’t a black box like you’re saying, it’s fully auditable and decentralized so any fuckery is immediately visible.
Their point is that even in this system, there is both a small and finite number of people who are skilled enough/qualified enough to perform that audit. I’m not sure I’ve got the math to be able to validate a blockchain transaction by hand without referring to a (potentially tainted) source repo. There’s a world where blockchain voting can solve this problem, but the competing requirements make it the less-optimal solution compared with paper voting.
Specifically, there are 3 potentially competing requirements for a secure voting system in a functioning democracy:
Blockchains, potentially, optimize the voting problem for #1 while introducing explicit exposure in #s 2 and 3, while paper ballots optimize for 2 first, then 3.
No, they were people who were associated with the march organizers who were looking out for people doing a terrorism.
This, it was explicitly supposed to be a joke coin. The fact that it trades fairly consistently (if at low value) is kind of an abberation
That effort was intentionally sabotaged after Lincoln’s assassination. So there’s that.
Site Reliability Engineering, a.k.a. the sysadmins babysitting the Big servers
send that shit over yptb, 24bugsinabigcoat did nothing wrong
That’s my understanding of the gameplan
SRE always starting shit
This is 1000% funnier because of the avatar with the dog head
Someone correct me on this, but didn’t the Russian intelligence apparatus know what subtlties were in the past? or did they always take a victory lap in public before the fix was in?
It’s a ruling pending the actual trial which will happen later. Procedurally, this is done when the action being restrained is likely or liable to cause irreparable harm in the time between now or the trial, or when the case is so cut and dried that the judge expects it to be settled out of court in the interim.
This is likely correct but the browser’s errors should be telling you what the error(s) is/are.
That’s what he said, irrelevant
Conceptually it’s fine, but I 100% expect, in the fullness of time, I’ll accidentally post in one not thinking about it since I pretty much exclusively operate from the firehose feed. Until there’s a little more tooling around it (like, if I could mark a community as ‘read-only for me’) , I think strict/aggressive moderation to enforce that rule is kinda problematic.