Maybe it's because people drive them away from other spaces by doing things like calling them weird pseudo-slurs like "Normies", instead of engaging with them as valid human beings with different lives, experiences and interests who don't always want exactly what we want.
This would have been quite poignant and an historic image, had some child not copy pasted pictures of cartoon eyes onto that brave woman's arse, making a mockery of their fight against fascism, presumably to discredit her and support the US Gestapo.
These people are everyday heroes, I don't think I could do what they do, as much as I would want to. I have nothing but respect for people like her <3
We are taking him seriously, that's why we're improving our defences and strengthening our resolve to defend ourselves from military aggression.
Would Europe and her allies "win" a war with the USA? Difficult to say, depends what the win conditions are. Maybe not.
But she's got enough strength to make it a many years long affair, ending in nukes if up against the wall. Europe may not win, but it'll be a pyrrhic victory for the invaders.
Hopefully that knowledge will persuade the USA not to wage war against us. The best outcome is peace and international cooperation through mutual trust and a strong moral center.
We can only hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.
In what way does that make his statements here invalid? And, if it's not your intention to throw doubt upon this view of the growing conflict between ourselves and the USA, why bring it up?
People are not one dimensional, it's possible for them to both want things we disagree with, and still be right and aligned with us on other things.
The USA may be weak in their dedication to alliances and giving their now untrustworthy word to provide mutual defence, but we in Europe are not.
When a NATO nation is attacked and calls for aid, we will answer, as we have in the past when such threats and tyranny arose.
That is the promise of civilisation. That's what separates us from the barbarians that would seek to destroy or enslave us all to build more power for themselves.
Regardless of the outcome for us Europeans, good or bad, the USA invading a NATO nation will mean war. Hopefully a phoney war that's resolved quickly, but regardless, war. Period.
The question is, are they willing to burn every single alliance and friendship they have, and start a literal third world war, just to annex Greenland?
And for what reason? If they wanted more military presence there (they already have some, don't forget) they could just ask, Denmark is their friend and ally (not that the USA remembers this or cares about alliances any more), and would be open to discussing the details and sorting things out.
It seems like the actions of a deranged madman, not the calculated moves of an intelligent, purposeful world power.
They'll have to do massive genocide and slaughter millions and millions of people across Europe for them to be remembered in such a manner.
They may indeed end up doing just that, and they may even "win", but we have nukes in Europe and if we're going down we're taking them with us, that's for sure.
mistakes Zuma’s bone for a gun, and shoots indiscriminately at the fleeing canine while shouting his signature catchphrase, “These paws uphold the laws!”
You can tell it's satire because something so ridiculous would never happen in real life
Maybe it's because people drive them away from other spaces by doing things like calling them weird pseudo-slurs like "Normies", instead of engaging with them as valid human beings with different lives, experiences and interests who don't always want exactly what we want.