Homemaker or not, marriage promotes economic stability because of tying folks outcomes together. As an edifice, the State likes that a spouse probably steps in before aid programs or whatever.
"All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of property within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax..."
So taxes on things need to be uniform (so, like, 2.5% on ALL property or ALL Doritos).
The voters approved a bracketed state income tax back in the day, but a lawsuit from it basically said "income is property." So they could probably do a flat tax on income, but those are stupid.
But that same article also says "All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of property within the territorial limits of the authority levying the tax..." and pure value doesn't constitute a different class.
That's basically what I remember backed up by two searches on Google, so sorry if I'm wrong.
Any good billionaire could donate down to being a hundred-millionaire and live a life of obscene comfort for generations. Why wouldn't you, if you weren't trash?
Schools aren't full public settings, but limited public forums. First and Fourth Amendment protections are much lower, for example.
And, yes, student expectations of privacy are lower, but a lot of things (like filming other students) are restricted for safety and to avoid "substantial disruption" of the learning environment. It isn't legally justified by them being minors. Filming minors in public is generally legal.
This kid would be in trouble for violating school rules around filming (or laws against stalking or something, but that doesn't apply here).
Legally, however, it could be argued that if his IG or tiktok or whatever is monetized, he's filming for commerical purposes, which would require permits/releases, but that's not what they're focusing on here, either.
And that's not getting into potential FERPA violations and the like. Anyway, schools are an odd space, legally.
They sorta have to agree (because of sovereign immunity). But there are laws like the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act that already (probably) pave the way for this lawsuit. Additionally, if the government is acting outside statutory authority (ultra vires), sovereign immunity doesn't protect the same way.
Also, this would almost certainly be heard in the U.S. Court of International Trade, which deals with tariffs and the like, and has its own rules and such. So... it's complicated?
AI says to!