…which sure seems to recognize that there is a threat from russia that needs deterrence, and that NATO is the thing that deters it.
I recognize that no country will attack a nuclear power. NATOs role is applying nuclear power to countries that not having it. Nuclear weapons make the stalemate, until one crazy guy makes the move. The thing is that we are back in the cold war era of thinking again. Like no real progress ever made in humanity.
Thats why I'm not picking sides. It doesn't really matter and i don't have to. If they start the shit its the same for everybody.
The tariff on Steel in USA is very very old (1800s). It was to protect their own production, which would plummet if the tariff was not existed. I think after WW2 remained very low (5%), only to reappear temporarily in 2000s and permanently with the 1st Trump presidency, which Biden kept and now Trump has doubled.
Ofc the reappear of tariffs on Steel made the Steel prices get higher (huge spikes after new tariffs and higher average price in the long term) and all the products made of it. So prepare for American cars price hike.
NATO? Wants to keep things how they are? With USA major part of it? No one wants to keep thing how they are. Everyone wants more.
Russia will not invade a NATO country because the risk is too high (Europe has nukes).It's just an exsuse to drive the world in an arms race and a cold war 2.
WW3 won't be about what regime governs what, but if human civilisation will survive.
Picking sides brings nothing. I always side with the defenders, no matter what. Putting NATO as defenders is a huge talk.
Ans the same amount of Oxygen atoms.