the content I was posting was all explicitly about animal liberation. I can support anticapitalist action even if some facet of it isn’t perfectly in line with my own worldview.

you don’t need to read every line if you trust your package maintainers

I use Debian btw

this doesn’t answer the question.

if you don’t think fascists should be shot, what do you think should be done with them? or cops?

there is definitely a civility problem. the solution is temporary bans that get longer if the incivility is refrequented.

I don’t believe in permabans for anything except stuff that would get the admins arrested, and even some of that maybe not.

what is their distro called

it does, but it is insufficient to prove it.

not disroot pallet

here are two of the proposed community icons

https://bonfirenetworks.org/

http://campground.bonfire.cafe/

I said what I meant: voting is not harm reduction, and voting for Harris didn’t reduce any harm

How does anti-electoralism prevent alternatives from gaining traction?

I didn’t say it does. you are arguing with a strawman

I think you should just read what you wrote. you seem to be able to put the words in the right order, without understanding what they mean.

voting Harris didn’t reduce any harm, but it did prevent real alternatives from gaining traction.

bacteria, fungus, plants, protozoa, and (arguably) viruses are all alive, too. bed bugs. rattlesnakes. being alive isn’t actually that special, nor a reason, in itself, to refrain from eating or killing that thing.

i know but there is definitely a double entendre in there.

harm reduction has a specific meaning, and voting is not harm reduction

guilt-framed