Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
0
Comments
775
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Well tbf this is a pretty shit piece.

    First the author conflates that people like being in the EU with the idea that member states should integrate further in (as in cede power to) the EU. Starting off on a lie doesn't usually bode well for this kind of texts.

    He claims that this offers opportunities to coordinate migration policies but when they do, it's wrong because he doesn't like the policy. He claims that they should stand strong in military defence against Russian aggression but when they do, he's against it because the moment the US suspended their aid they acted immediately instead of just waiting for checks notes the European Parliament agreeing on starting a unified EU-army.

    This guy just reads like someone that wants the EU to become just like the US regarding centralization, but with his own policies instead of those inconveniently voted for by his fellow citizens.

  • Just so we´re clear: your entire argument hinges on the idea that Israelis didn´t have settlements in Gaza before?

  • They had settlements there before, and now they want to build them back. It´s really weird to franctically want to avoid the word ´rebuild´ in this case

  • Do you think readers will completely ignore what they want to rebuild?

  • You can only interpret the wording the BBC is using in the way you propose if you believe settling in Gaza is a peaceful affair

    No-one is reading that BBC article thinking the Gazans are peacefully evacuating their homes so their jewish friends can rebuild their settlement

  • Again, if you interpret Israelis settling in Gaza as ´peacefully´ taking something ´already theirs´ then that´s more of a you problem than a BBC problem

  • So "active in the movement to settle" is different from "settling" for you?

    I think the problem is that your personal interpretation of ´settlement´ is more positive than what it means in reality

  • Note the use of "rebuild" ... BBC always framing it as if it was Israels land to begin with.

    Which wording would you propose they use?

  • What media are you reading where Israel is halting their attacks

  • They were quick to add barricades the previous time they expected a mass stampede... But it´s hard to imagine them being able to hold back a million determined refugees without it looking bad on tv.

    I still fear that that´s what it´ll come down to though. A lot of people are never going to forgive them if they let them out

  • That´s how you build brand confidence

  • Why don't you run yourself?

  • By itself, no

  • More like less repairable

  • The US can do a 180 in 4 years. China: not so much

  • You sound like a caricature account ran by the Mossad to discredit pro-Palestinian posters

  • And can you describe what you think is wrong with that article? Does it make you question whether those 60+ dead were unrelated to the Israeli attack??

    If that's the case then it's just an issue of the Guardian being written for smarter people

  • You gave a link accusing them of quoting Israeli officials

    You don't seem to be able to back up your accusation that they have been avoiding to use the word 'killed'. So why make it?

    The Guardian is not misinforming their readers about what's happening in Gaza.

    The way you're talking about this is telling me that you're too far gone to look at these things objectively

  • Do you have any examples of the Guardian dancing around the word 'killed'? The fact you have to resort to their reporting on unrelated issues seems to suggest that's not really the case