Why don’t you run yourself?

By itself, no

More like less repairable

The US can do a 180 in 4 years. China: not so much

You sound like a caricature account ran by the Mossad to discredit pro-Palestinian posters

And can you describe what you think is wrong with that article? Does it make you question whether those 60+ dead were unrelated to the Israeli attack??

If that’s the case then it’s just an issue of the Guardian being written for smarter people

You gave a link accusing them of quoting Israeli officials

You don’t seem to be able to back up your accusation that they have been avoiding to use the word ‘killed’. So why make it?

The Guardian is not misinforming their readers about what’s happening in Gaza.

The way you’re talking about this is telling me that you’re too far gone to look at these things objectively

Do you have any examples of the Guardian dancing around the word ‘killed’? The fact you have to resort to their reporting on unrelated issues seems to suggest that’s not really the case

Do you have anything to back this up? I’ve never felt The Guardian was using euphemisms

Then just ask them if they would share their work for free, or recreate it yourself?

Did they write their own software?

If that’s your concern, definitely don’t use Plex.

Or IPTV

Paying devs

Also, unlimited executive power for the top dog

Who tf made him the video governor?

Good, then we both agree the source doesn’t support the “hundreds of thousands murdered in Poland” claim.

Lol, if you want to try and move the goalposts from my “murdered Poles” to your “in Poland”, I can only say that’s just childish. Do you think it’s better if they died in Russia?

No, I really cannot pretend knowing more about defeating fascism in Europe that the nation which ultimately defeated fascism, at the IMMENSE cost of 25 million lives in the struggle against Nazism.

Hexbear incoming. “They helped defeat the nazis so the bottom line is we can’t criticize them”.

Imagine how we would look at the US if they had decided it was more profitable to just team up with the nazis instead

That’s a book on migrations and deportations, not a book on casualties, it doesn’t seem to support a claim of “hundreds of thousands murdered” which you made in your previous comment, could you please elaborate?

Again, you’re conflating murdered with deported

It most certainly includes direct casualty numbers as well, for Poland and many other conflicts.

Great, please name one of them that doesn’t imply complete occupation of Poland by Nazis

I just can’t envision an alternative reality

Well, I think that’s the main issue here. Siding with the nazis, attacking Poland in the rear when they were fighting the nazis, committing horrible crimes against the Polish population and POWs … You really, really cannot imagine not having to do even one of those

Well I’m not sure if that’s from the book you suggested, but if it is I must say the language is a tad bit romanticized lol. Might I suggest better sources

I don’t know if the other three chapters you suggested get any better but in your quote it only argues that collaborating with the nazis was “their only option” if you first agree to start from the premise that they *checks notes* “just had to claim those territories” to which they “had a far better right”

Imagine if the UK or the US had allied with the nazis and attacked Western Europe in the back, out of fear and begging them for spoils… (as some politicians argued, I might add)?

I get that the book you want me to read claims, like the previous poster, that the only option Russia had was to secretly team up with the nazis and attack the Poles from the rear

But my question is not so much to repeat that but to support it with arguments

Could you paraphrase the parts of the book that would be relevant?