This story is about French/space/communications/technology. Not American/politics/racist/conspiracy. Not one genre overlap
It’s about the one overlap that you missed out: frickin space lasers
This story is about French/space/communications/technology. Not American/politics/racist/conspiracy. Not one genre overlap
It’s about the one overlap that you missed out: frickin space lasers
I think that we know the answer to that don’t we?
We’ll keep hold of them in case we need them regardless of the fact that using them now would drastically reduce the chances of us needing them later.
That’s ignoring the humane reason for sharing because that won’t be considered relevant to any decision made.
As an aside, Sanchez is missing the fact that the EV tarriffs were implemented in response to excessive state aid by the PRC. It’s not good for him to promise to drop the tarriffs without committing to more negotiation regarding the EU’s concerns about state aid.
That is a pretty huge thing to ignore too. Without the EU imposing tariffs, China could shut down the EV industry in the EU. Without tariffs, any country could shut down any industry in another country unless the other country also provides subsidies.
I’m not sure that’s the fault of XML though.
It’s more the fault of the implementation and documentation.
We have a WCF service with an odd configuration and nobody has been able to integrate with it that didn’t use Microsoft tools. It’s definitely not XML’s fault.
(That service has been replaced with a REST API now)
Well, as we provide Israel with only around 1% of their arms imports I think that we could only ever hope to make a political statement rather than having any real impact.
Same in the UK but we’ve only just done anything about it.
Which means that he could also not override congress and not send Israel guns or cash.
It seems that they intend Microsoft Loop to be the collaborative notes app now.
It’s replaced OneNote as the meeting notes app and it has more flexible access control.
Currently they also only have one version as it’s a progressive web app (that might change with time though).
Surely, any company that has made a financial decision to not fix something because fixing it is more expensive than paying compensation to the relatives of people they kill should be guilty of murder.
If they kill more than five or ten people it would be mass murder and probably subject to the death penalty.
Boeing would be getting worried right now if this was how it worked.
I guess that that’s all that matters.
Did it take time to get used to or did it work straight away?
That’s the problem isn’t it.
I’d have no problem paying for privacy respecting access to websites that I used frequently except that I don’t trust them to keep their end of the deal.
I don’t see the problem with this search result. You searched for Lemmy clients and the first link gives a list of Lemmy clients for Android. It happens to be on Reddit but it does match your search.
Yes, but their edit says that it shouldn’t take so long to get to IMDB which is what I was commenting on.
The fact that there is only one result is awful.
That’s Amazon’s way of working. They push the content that they want you to use over what you want to use.
In fairness, IMDB is right there on the first info card.
lol. We’re short of prison space so get the deal with Rwanda for immigrants changed to be criminals instead.
Yeah. It’s a pretty meaningless statistic really.
I was definitely more likely to leave the UK after the brexit referendum than before it but I’m still here. The chances before were less than 1% and the chances after were closer to 1% but probably still didn’t exceed it.
P.s. I’m not a millionaire in case anyone is wondering.
Every week or two there’s a new ceasefire deal on the table and then Netanyahu says something to the tune of “but we’re not stopping until Hamas is gone”.
It seems that the negotiators don’t have the authority to negotiate for anything other than “you stop shooting now and we’ll stop shooting when you’re dead”.
It’s mostly in a spoiler tag and is intended for it to give you only the conclusion and you’d need to click through to get to the detail.
It doesn’t work on my client though.
It’s purely about the power of advertising. It is the most trusted news channel in the uk with around 70% of the country watching BBC One for their news. The second most popular news channel is ITV at 49%.
So they could launch an appeal without the BBC but they could be missing up to half the population. Although it’s difficult to tell because they could also be missing none of the population if those that don’t watch ITV watch other non-BBC channels.
I think that the concern that they have (regarding the ability to actually deliver aid) is valid. We’ve heard a lot of stories about aid delivery not working so how are the aid agencies going to ensure that they can use the money that they collect from the appeal for the specified purpose?