Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
帖子
14
评论
1009
加入于
2 yr. ago

I'm a climate scientist by trade. Interested in interesting things. Ecology, complexity, politics, social change, music.

  • If platforms are providing affordances for abuse and profiting off it, then they are too.

  • I think it probably starts a long way before a kiss or a touch. At least, I'd hope it does.

  • Sure, getting arrested is always a risk with civil disobedience. I've been to a few corporate and political party office sit-ins. Usually we've had one or two people (sometimes hundreds) volunteer to be arrested, and others leave before it gets to that point. How risky that is for the ones leaving early will depend a lot on how the authorities act in your jurisdiction though.

  • I wasn't taking about an individual, I was talking about humans as a species and culture.

  • No. You can read signs. Like foot prints, or fire scars. Or you can count actually objects before you invent tallying.

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • I've been finding that a) google is the fucking worst, most others do better, and b) results on the 2nd and 3rd pages are becoming more and more relevant.

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • Relationships are complex. What's "cheating" for some people is fine for others. And there's usually a million factors complicating everything. Maybe you're mum's a bit naive, maybe she's bang on. Both can be true in different ways.

  • Damn, when the German press can say this, the AP should really pick up their game

  • Tiktok would be pulling most away

  • Bluesky is VC backed. Just because they aren't turning a profit yet doesn't mean that's not the end-game for them.

  • 已被移除

    The Grimoire

    跳过
  • Yeah, low effort AI trash

    1. Its different for everyone, and there will usually be multiple influencing factors, not just one big one, but
    2. I already pointed out one big one in my last sentence.
  • Eh? Corporate HQs are all in city centres, and the vast majority of people live in cities...

  • I don't think there's some fraction of people who are ethically driven, and the rest don't care. Everyone sits on multiple spectra for what they care about, and where their thresholds for acting are. Most people are under the pump for cost of living, and that's pretty dominant when you're on the verge of poverty. Get those people a bit more stability, and they'll have more capacity to care about broader ethical ssues..

  • The old ways are being forgotten

  • To me its how roughly we want the fucking to be ultimately and can we bring it back down to a more tender and loving level.

    More or less, yeah

  • "climate based economy"?

  • "Point of no return" is a simplistic concept. It depends on the your threshold for how bad it gets. Most climate scientists would agree that we're just at or about to pass the 1.5°C target. But they would also agree that ever extra fraction of a degree matters. It's not a question of "when are we fucked?" Its a question of "how quickly can we act to minimise severity of change?"

    Source: am climate scientist, have been to a major climate conference in the last few months, and talk to other climate scientists regularly.

  • There are no carbon capture and storage technologies proven to work at a meaningful scale.