Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
14
Comments
1009
Joined
2 yr. ago

I'm a climate scientist by trade. Interested in interesting things. Ecology, complexity, politics, social change, music.

  • Get a different girlfriend

  • I think OP is saying that they have an old 3d printer that they made/love, and their spouse got them a new (better, nicer looking, but less sentimental) 3d printer.

  • Fair! Definitely wouldn't have complained, but I'm a different person :)

  • Yes, and:

    "For my birthday, my spouse got me a nicer newer expensive version of a thing I already have."

    Seems clear that the gift was a replacement printer?

  • Agree, and I said as much in a separate comment. We also don't know anything about the delivery of the gift giver, either though..

  • "The one I have was given to me by my mother in law, whom I adore. It’s sentimental. ... it was a kit and I had to build myself. I loved it. It’s perfect for me. "

    It's right there in the OP

  • They literally said the old one still "works just fine"...

    And it seems clear from the text that it's a 3D printer

  • Sounds like a relationship with a fair bit of conflict avoidance? I hope you have some good relief valves..

  • Good take.

  • Nah, that's nonsense. Sounds like the old one was sufficient, and had deeper meaning attached to it.

  • I think from a factual basis your position sounds perfectly reasonable, I feel similarly about new things. (Perhaps there are other parts of the story missing though?)

    There's a lot to be said for delivery. If you opened a gift an reacted badly immediately, that would hurt. Even if the gift was misjudged, it was probably meant with good intent. Accepting thankfully, acknowledging the intention, and THEN coming around to the "but you really should have checked in first for something like this" might be a good way to start.

  • Yeah, I think AI optimising commercial music genres is just effectively doing what the corporate music industry has been doing for years anyway. It's like gamification of the auditory processing system.

  • It is possible for genAI to be creative in that sense (e.g. move 37), but it's not possible for it to know whether that new thing is good/valuable/true/whatever. So it can't challenge an idea in any sense more meaningful than a monkey throwing darts. A human could use it to generate challenges, and then evaluate them, but that's a different proposition.

  • On your first point, I think it's not so much about reputation as about trust. Long-standing accounts at least have the simple trust that's based on consistency and familiarity. If you meet a new person IRL, you at least get something to go off based on visuals and behavioural cues. A new account online has absolutely nothing to base any trust on.

  • Emotions (and hence also a lot of thinking) have a lot of physical and chemical processes involved too, it's not just neural signalling.

  • The outputs becoming indistinguishable does not imply that the generative processes are the same.

  • Eh, they weren't gonna win the next election anyway. This is just gonna reinforce that. Hopefully the fully implode by then.