Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
14
Comments
1010
Joined
2 yr. ago

I'm a climate scientist by trade. Interested in interesting things. Ecology, complexity, politics, social change, music.

  • Haha, sick. Count me in if you want a beta tester :)

  • Oh yeah, that sounds like a trip.

    As an Aussie, I approve.

  • What's the gist?

  • What does the name refer to?

  • A plugin that just checks to see if Lemmy has any posts pointing to the current URL would be pretty nice. So I can go and get secondary opinions if I want.

    Not sure how much stress that would put on servers though. I guess probably not that much if searches can just be exact matches on URLs.

  • Interesting. I grew up in a science-heavy family, and eventually became a scientist. A LOT of what's been changing my worldview recently has been a kind of deprogramming from science - reductionist science. Complexity theory in particular, as well as breaking down the dominant cultural view of linear technological progress.

    I don't have anything really super useful at the 101 level, but I'll definitely plug some of the stuff on !complexity@lemmy.world community - it's not necessarily introductory material, but some of it is super accessible and fun to engage with (especially some of the videos).

  • What's the gist? Or, what did it change about your worldview?

  • That's not how I ready their statement... I think Hawke is saying that AI itself is not inherently bad, just that it's being used for bad things. The bad things they identified are different from yours, but I think you're basically saying the same thing over-all?

  • Ah, sorry, I misread.

  • I suspect a lot of the former group is don't that out of ignorance or forgetfulness - I do it all the time, because I often assume people are talking about GenAI. Which is probably a reasonable assumption about 90% of the time these days, but it is better to be clear about it.

    Also, a friend who has a background in AI draws a distinction between ML and non-generative AI: ML is basically tools for overpowered statistical analysis and pattern finding, AI is attempts to partially recreate aspects of intelligence, and can include evolutionary algorithms and stuff. Still not sure I see the distinction (and there is overlap), but they're way more informed than me..

  • GenAI being used in missile guidance makes zero sense - the technology is not applicable there, because you need precision and reliability. Normal AI, sure.

  • I agree with Hawke, I think people are against the use of technology in such a way that it exploits workers and customers, not fundamentally against the technology itself.

    Basically like the Luddites - they smashed weaving looms, not because the technology was fundamentally bad, but because it was being used by capitalists to worsen working conditions and destroy livelihoods.

  • Wait until you run out of dishes before you start to wash any.

  • Are people anti non-generative AI? Or is broader AI just getting dragged in to the justified anti genAI sentiment?

  • Would they throw it away if it was hard to read or something?

  • I'd it a mouldy onion? Cause that probably ups it to an unpleasant curse

  • Brutal

  • This is not mild. Once a month is bad enough

  • I understand what a chilling effect is. But you can't post here without your user name being attached to it. So posting is not relevant to this issue about votes, is it?