You guys keep coming back with glib answers meant to comment on the question, and you're missing the point.
I genuinely don't know what the complaint is. I need someone to tell me that it's about people finding it gross to be within 30 cm of something previously exposed to a naked butt cheek for cultural reasons or something. I genuinely don't get it. Like, in practical terms. It's not a rhetorical question.

Ah. And this is automated bodycam transcription software that is getting manually reviewed. So the wonky report didn't show up in court, the person getting the explanation is an officer manually reviewing the automated report.
I mean... funny, but... I don't know that I have a massive problem with this. I guess the real questions are whether the review process is faster than writing a manual summary and whether there would be a scenario where manual review is neglected in the future.