Your last paragraph is tangential to what I said. It doesn't disagree because it says something different. It's also oversimplified in some ways and just wrong in others.
- Posts
- 72
- Comments
- 118
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
- Posts
- 72
- Comments
- 118
- Joined
- 3 yr. ago
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml European governments shrinking railways in favour of road-building, report finds
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml On this day in 1967, Protests in London against a ban on drink driving
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml ‘Autobesity’ on course to worsen air pollution caused by motoring
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml 85% Of Car Drivers Break 20mph Speed Limits, Reveals U.K.’s Department For Transport
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml 4chan gets it
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml Geometry hates cars
Memes @lemmy.ml The aliens are definitely real
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml There's 3000 cars on fire in the North Sea
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml The experience they sell to you vs the experience you get
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml Tired of men lying about commitment
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml When your city implements confusing cycling infrastructure
Fuck Cars @lemmy.ml Car crashes on Swiss road, response is to ban bikes



Did they though? To some extent, yes. But most people just want to get places and will take whichever mode makes the most sense for that journey, and what a city invests in will make that mode make more sense for more journeys. There is also a portion of journeys that just won't happen if they are too difficult.