Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
0
Comments
740
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It's like how most of you consume things that are bad and wrong. Hundreds of musicians that are really just a couple dudes writing hits. Musicians that pay to have their music played on stations. Musicians that take talent to humongous pipelines and churn out content. And it's every industry, isn't it?

    So much flexing over what conveyor belt you eat from.

    I've watched 30+ years of this slop. And now there's ai. And now people that have very little soul, who put little effort into tuning their consumption, they get to make a bunch of noise about the lack of humanity in content.

  • Contestants must run through these brick walls, swim through the magma pool, climb the 50' smooth steel wall, and jump the chasm before smashing the watermelon at the end! Only the top 8 killbots will move on to the next round.

  • Their Programming is now "we need to avoid WW3, Russia will nuke us, we need to avoid unnecessary bloodshed, it's got nothing to do with us"

    A bunch of them instantly became bleeding heart pacifists because wearing that hat let's you say the things best things for the current news cycle.

    I think I saw one or two people trying to say this has always been the conservative position. I mean what's America first but being anti war? It's like different trumpers just sit there in a plastic box waiting to be activated. Crickets when conservatives are doing X, Y, Z, but then suddenly these things appear when it's convenient. Hey everyone, these magats didn't call for political violence! These magats have always been against foreign wars!

  • I think you're describing the plan, while I'm predicting the chimaera that will be born from conflicting politics. Billionaires have a plan but they aren't gods. How will the country exist when we're all sidelined and corporations import slaves? Will Palantir et al usher in a new paradigm? Is modern surveillance the eponymous straw on our backs? I just think that billionaires won't get what they want, and that they hit very hard, and the result of those two facts implies we're going to be beaten to within an inch of our lives.

  • My logic? People are acting like men's divisions are the open divisions when it's very much closed to anyone not wanting to endure constant harassment. I don't think adding facts to the discussion implies any logic aside from the logic in valuing the truth.

  • Ok but, education is a subsidy for corporations. It makes sure we're educated enough to be worth hiring. Among other things, education is important in making us competitive.

    Nobody should want this except for traitorous elites ready to leave the country the instant the tap runs dry. Even the most soulless neolib/conservative ought to realize education is necessary.

  • Exactly. It's a power move to change the subject. Imagine addressing people's issues... you're just sitting in their domain. You have to change what people are talking about too. He doesn't need to keep defending against X, Y, and Z if we start attacking his idea of "the greater good" and "agentic force projection."

  • Same chess where men creep on women and female grandmasters report being harassed whenever they try to compete alongside men?

    I don't think women feel welcome when you can accost them and if they say anything they're just a bitch lying to cause problems.

  • Police get caught running searches on their ex girlfriends. Police are barely better than gangs and they're using sophisticated tech to fuck with their local communities. Brilliant. Add the CEO of Flock to the list of persona non grata.

  • That's basically the AI definition given by DDG.

    But nobody uses the phrase like that. When Reagan said he was draining the swamp, and his followers repeated the line, what do you think they said? Probably some shit like, "let's make the government more efficient."

    Ok. Fine. That actually fits the phrase, even if Reagan was lying and giving corpos more control.

    But 40 years later when you ask someone what they mean by "drain the swamp" and they express ideas of... imprisoning Democrats, getting rid of the big Jews, dismantling the liberal deep state.

    People used "literally" sarcastically / for effect, and dictionaries added a new definition. So I think it's fair to add a new definition for "drain the swamp" when people use it to mean "get rid of liberals."

  • Vigilantes never had such big beautiful lists. Other presidents, other presidents, nuclear, other presidents never, and I was just saying, other presidents, because there are others, oh boy there are others, you don't want to know about them though, but there are others, and I was saying, other presidents, look these are — I just shit my pants.

  • "If we assume X theorem is true, Y theorem is true, and lemma Z is true, then ..."

    This is actually about our models and seeing their incompleteness in a new light, right? I don't think starting from arbitrary axioms and then trying to build reality was about proving qualities about reality. Or am I wrong? Just seems like they're using "simulated reality" as a way to talk about our models for reality. By constructing a "silly" argument about how we can't possibly be in a matrix, they're revealing just how much we're still missing.

  • Assume I read the article and then made a post.

  • It was a reddit post and a bunch of corpo news talking about the reddit post. Samsung didn't trick anyone, the ML algorithms were always in the open, people just had to turn off the "scene optimizer" mode.

    It definitely seems like it was a big thing but it's hard to see if literally anything happened as a result or if anyone actually cared.

  • Republicans get higher bills but they know they're on the right side, and so set to work building up the next link in the chain of lies.

    Let's watch as they create new lore. What surprising developments will come out, before becoming a thing every single one of them says they believe?

    Today, XYZ has never touched the lips of a conservative. In one week, XYZ will be why they voted for whoever, whatever. XYZ will be a core belief championed by every true Republican.

  • Imagine writing that line lmao

    You look around and practically every man has a scar on his head. Scars from childhood, scars from construction work. Basically everyone has some mark. And head wounds bleed a lot, and can look gnarly when healed. Some wise guy knew that and decided to fuck with people anyway.

    Nostradamus out here predicting the future by writing about... burning towers, and powerful empires... oh shit it's 9/11!

  • I wonder what it means. If you search for music by Suicidal Tendencies then YouTube shows you a suicide hotline. What does it mean for OpenAI to say people are talking about suicide? They didn't open up and read a million chats... they have automated detection and that is being triggered, which is not necessarily the same as people meaningfully discussing suicide.

  • It's funny when you're playing soccer and you're locked in and then out of nowhere a player gets domed by the ball. Especially when you smoothly recover like you meant to rocket the ball off the defenders head.

  • I get looking at terrorism as a simple data point and then saying left wing terrorism is on the rise. When there's more violence then it's indicative of underlying problems.

    But most of the time the conversation implies people need to clean up their act. Politicians must stop using charged language. People must chill out.

    In that vein, I'm curious how much left wing violence is real. When people are getting shot down for trying to get abortions, getting put on lists...

    That's like playing half a chord progression.

    But when you fight back, that's also a terrorism. Hitting the bully is still violence, and can't we all just chill?? Lmao