Okay, so you're saying would do evil for a big enough pile of money? If you had enough to get along in relative comfort would you still?
Lots of people who see no other options commit crimes to get money and 'stuff', but if we all had a guaranteed income, I wonder which people would be enticed to do evil just to get still more money. The evil wouldn't be 'torturing those you love', but more like letting some company dump lead in the water supply. Personally, I couldn't allow that for any monetary price.
Answer: Law enforcement itself doesn't have anything in place, but they call people who care.
Baby monkeys are hard, but:
Fischer, contact list at the ready, quickly found the babies a temporary placement at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park, which had staff and facilities to do both the quarantine and the baby care. “They were immediately able to jump into action, call that agent back and start communicating,” says Fischer. The park staff even made the six-hour round-trip drive to pick up and triage the babies. “They were rock stars.”
For others. If I'm staying home, I dress like I'm homeless in whatever grungy dirty things that already need washing. If I'm going out, my hair is combed, my threads are fresh and I'm not getting denied entrance to the restaurant. The movie Blast from the Past was pretty stupid, but it did teach me (remind me?) that you dress nice as a courtesy to your friends.
They want options. They don't want to leave now , but maybe later. Maybe when you pull out the vacuum cleaner or when the TV gets too loud. Mostly, it's nice to have another escape route.
Years ago a friend was in a horrible car wreck and came out mostly paralyzed and with no memory of the last few years. She didn't remember her college friends and clung to her newly found relgious support group. She was never religious before. Her personality was completely different in numerous ways. She was effectively a different person and we no longer had anything in common. I don't know what happened to her after that, but I mourned the loss of a friend.
Almost a third of Americans who could vote don't -- either by not registering at all or registering but not casting a ballot. Do you really think people who don't have the time to vote -- people with jobs and/or kids at home -- want to "do research" for their down time? They aren't 'going' anywhere. They flip on the boob tube and catch whatever has made it to cable/free-streaming. Then they are disappointed because they liked the first one and this new one is so bad by comparison.
I'm retired, so I do research, and while I'm not the one complaining, I DO sympathize with the complainers that don't want to invest as much time as I do on inspecting the lineage of a film and what might make it worth viewing.
I've seen interesting remakes and sequels -- like just this week I rewatched Fassbinder's original The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant because I hadn't yet seen Ozon's remake, Peter von Kant, where the main characters reverse sexes. There's more crossovers with those two directors and I care about it, so I watch all those. What I didn't see was all the Spidermans, Batmans, and Marvel movies.
Ah, but the production money doesn't flow to many original movies, but almost always gets invested in existing franchises. The result is a bunch of original movies that would have been better if they'd had a bigger budget. Add to that the issue of marketing: no one is going to the film that doesn't advertise, have guests on talk shows, and gets limited distribution. The big studios have contracts with the theaters and tiny films are frequently relegated to art houses.
Lastly, I don't think it is fair to ask people to do homework on which movies to watch. I mean, I do that, but I'm a freak that way. Most people don't have the time, and they aren't looking for the next Citzen Cane, they're looking for a light escape from a difficult week. Ideally, people would follow a critic that has tastes similar to their own, but in the fractured world of the internet, that gets hard. There are too many voices and they rotate in and out too often to figure out who's currently matching your tastes.
True, but I'll cut early Hollywood some slack because some of the reboots were from silent to talkies or from black and white to colour. I like the talkie version of Gunga Din better than the silent version, but I like the black and white Philadelphia Story more than the remake, High Society. The color 1942 version of Jungle Book was really good, but Disney's cartoon version with songs and all was better childhood entertainment. I think I watched a more modern reboot at some point? That was one interation too many.
The author understands their sources don't know the shooter's current thoughts on anything because he became isolated over the years. Older thoughts include:
Asked about the inscription on the bullet, the friend said: “Josh was an edgelord who wanted someone to get blamed. I think he tried his best to write something goofy … to rile people up.”
Another friend showed me a Facebook post describing how Jahn had flooded his friends’ comment sections with rape jokes — “playful shock humor,” the friend said.
More nuanced:
That said, one friend recalled that when Trump first came to power, Jahn “was not a fan” — though he had contempt for mainstream politicians in general. His friends say he had more of a libertarian bent, with one recalling an interest in the libertarian figure Ron Paul.
And finally:
“If you’re having trouble finding people besides immediate family who knew him, that’s part of the story,” one friend said. “Every mutual friend drifted away over that kind of edgelord behavior.”
We rode without seatbelts in the back of stations wagons. Worse: just ready to fly free in pickup beds. It was almost expected that people would drink and drive.
All that said, you can still eat, drink, and change stations in most places and it is far, far less distracting than phones.
“Regardless of ABC’s plans for the future of the program, Sinclair intends not to return Jimmy Kimmel Live! to our air until we are confident that appropriate steps have been taken to uphold the standards expected of a national broadcast platform.”
The two largest station groups, Nexstar and Sinclair, wielded their influence over ABC‘s decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel‘s show from its ABC stations.
Nexstar strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets.”
Nexstar’s announcement was followed soon after by ABC’s decision to pull the show indefinitely.
Sinclair Broadcast Group, the largest of ABC’s affiliate groups, said that it also objected to Kimmel’s comments, and said that it would “not lift the suspension of ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ on our stations until formal discussions are held with ABC regarding the network’s commitment to professionalism and accountability.” It also called on Kimmel to make a direct apology to the Kirk family, and for the network to make a “meaningful donation” to them and Turning Point USA.
Wasn't this the initial 'threat' that got ABC to pull Kimmel? I thought Sinclair made this threat, then the FCC chimed in, then everyone else objected.
So now Sinclair is following through, and we'll see what the FCC does.
Citizens United and dark money PACs. As you can see from any given time Trump opens his mouth, people will belive any crazy lie so fast that an sincere politician without massive funding will be smeared with whatever the moneyed interests can dream up. To make sure money wins, they do stuff like remove polling places from poor areas so the lines get so long voters have to choose between getting to work and casting a ballot -- IF they can even get to the distant polling place. Texas just did that again a month or two ago.
According to Datos Insights, in 1992 there were 88,000 households worth $20 million or more in 2022 dollars; by 2022, there were 644,000. Those who could pay almost anything for a vacation were becoming their own mass market.
Paired with:
In 2012 the My Disney Experience app gave guests an easy way to check wait times, show times, restaurant bookings and more. In return, Disney gained a trove of information on exactly where guests went, what they purchased and how much they spent in its complex.
So now that we've got a system where you get perks for spending cash.
Fourteen hours later, Ms. Cressel has experienced nine of the park’s attractions, three in the Tier 1 category, plus a parade and the fireworks show. She and her companions leave, exhausted, at 11 p.m., when the park closes.
Note that part of that time was messing with a mobility scooter, but regardless it was less than 1 attraction per hour.
In all, Mr. Conahan and his daughter are able to visit 16 attractions, including all five of the park’s Tier 1 rides plus its two most coveted attractions — Seven Dwarfs and Tron — that charge separately for passes. They do all that, plus the lunch stop and a Dole Whip snack break, in just seven hours.
More than 2 attractions per hour at more than twice the price to get that access. The article implies that big spenders get other rewards, but it doesn't specify any except mentioning an invite-only club -- but we don't know if that invite is solely monetary or if it has frequent visits from, say, make-a-wish kids and other celebrities.
The OP was asking about terms like 'racist' -- not nazi. Yes, anyone walking in a group where there's a swastiza flag can be appropriately called a nazi because they chose to join in a group with that flag, BUT just because a person is considers themself a 'conservative' does not also make them a racist just as being a 'lefty' does not make them antisemetic. Maybe they are, but it takes an action or at least a comment -- not a general label -- to make a judgement.
Okay, so you're saying would do evil for a big enough pile of money? If you had enough to get along in relative comfort would you still?
Lots of people who see no other options commit crimes to get money and 'stuff', but if we all had a guaranteed income, I wonder which people would be enticed to do evil just to get still more money. The evil wouldn't be 'torturing those you love', but more like letting some company dump lead in the water supply. Personally, I couldn't allow that for any monetary price.