Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)M
Posts
8
Comments
2262
Joined
3 yr. ago

Hi guy

  • Peter thiel is everything wrong with the world.

    He is a plague, a cancer, a curse.

    He is in the Epstein files.

    He likely had his gay lover killed for revealing he was gay.

    Peter thiel is the enemy of humanity.

    Peter thiel is an antichrist

  • I agree that it should be able to infer the intent, but I stand by that it remain somewhat unclear and open to interpretation. Eg, If such language was used in a legal contract, it would not be enough to simply say, well, they should understand what I meant.

    The people doing this test, I'm sure, are not linguistic masters, nor legal scholars.

    There are lines of work where clarity is essential.

    And what if my question actually was asking, should I just go for a walk instead of driving that far?

    I know the answer. But as 30% demonstrated, clarity IS needed.

  • Understanding the intent of the question and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question:

    There are 3 sentences.

    I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No 'at the car wash'. No 'take my car to the car wash' . No 'take the car through the car wash'

    A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?

    Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.

    Do you see how this works?

    Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.

  • Understanding the intent of the question and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question are not related to autism. (In my case)

    I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No 'at the car wash'. No 'take my car to the car wash' . No 'take the car through the car wash'

    A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?

    Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.

    Do you see how this works?

    Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.

  • Without reading the article, the title just says wash the car.

    I could go for a walk and wash my car in my driveway.

    Reading the article... That is exactly the question asked. It is a very ambiguous question.

    I do understand the intent of the question, but it could be phrased more clearly.

  • That's how they are gonna take over Greenland;

    give them free medical supplies* shipping,handling,dispensing,and all the other insane fees not included

    bill them

    Now American bank owns Greenland!

  • Maybe it was because he was recording them with the creepy sex offender glasses that are only used by repervicans.

  • You know, it wasn't always like this

    Not very long ago, just before your time Right before the towers fell, circa '99 This was catalogs, travel blogs, a chatroom or two We set our sights and spent our nights waiting For you, you, insatiable you Mommy let you use her iPad, you were barely two And it did all the things we designed it to do Now, look at you, oh, ha, look at you You, you, unstoppable, watchable Your time is now, your inside's out, honey, how you grew And if we stick together, who knows what we'll do? It was always the plan to put the world in your hand

    ~ Bo Burnham

    Welcome to the Internet

  • Hardware will be available, silly.

    You will have the "freedom" to choose from the hardware vendor* you want. Like always! ‡‡

    For $49.95 per month.

    Terms and conditions and government social score apply.

    ‡‡ Authorized and approved by the department of national security and intelligence gathering agencies and the billionaire technofascist bros clubh

  • What if the 'aliens' are us. Or the AI that killed us.

    From the future.

    Or, decendents of eons old terrestrial civilizations that were highly advanced and were either wiped from the surface of the earth due to some geological cataclysm.

    Or, they have always lived in the oceans and we are one of their many genetic experiments - or maybe the harvest.

  • Repos can get / have been hacked/malicious code injected.

  • I wonder if putting up that sign (not everyone is welcome) with a few people in flowing white robes would be considered 👌Okkk

  • I swear the friendly future I had hoped of as a kid in the 80s/90s was either all propaganda, hijacked, or we actually did end up in an alternate timeline of pure fuckery.

    This is not the future I evangelized.

    And yeah, those of us who grew up through it have seen the horrific turn of things have taken from potential world changing awesome humanity, to absolute evil.

  • I think the happy comes with the unsaid "or else"

    You be happy or you be soylent.

  • In 2030 you will own nothing.

    And you will be happy.

  • This had become my favorite end of the world song and I hate that I have a favorite end of the world song that is so on the nose.

    20,0004 years of this.

    7 3 More to go.

  • Those were "weather balloons".

    And just one at a time.

    We can do this.

    (If that is a real kill decal, that is hilarious, though)

  • Canada @lemmy.ca

    New CBS owner David Ellison met with top Israeli general in scheme to spy on Americans - The Grayzone

    thegrayzone.com /2025/10/06/cbs-owner-israeli-general-spy-americans/
  • Android @lemmy.world

    Coincidence?

  • Showerthoughts @lemmy.world

    it was just now I realized how appropriate the CEO shooters' name is.

  • News @lemmy.world

    Seattle road sign references CEO shooting: 'Many more to go'

    www.seattletimes.com /seattle-news/health/seattle-road-sign-references-ceo-shooting/
  • NonCredibleDefense @sh.itjust.works

    Non-credible bomb threats against Atlanta-area polling places were from Russia, secretary of state says | CNN

    www.cnn.com /2024/11/05/us/georgia-non-credible-bomb-threat-russia/index.html
  • Books @lemmy.world

    Silverlocks and the Three Bears

  • no context @lemmy.world

    b&w

  • no context @lemmy.world

    no context