a relative of mine changed her name and her mother took it really hard. see, she's not... independent. she finally got an ASD diagnosis at 60 and her mother has had to help her with everything since she was a child. her mother was the only one who would help, because her toxic personality drives everyone away who doesn't have to be there due to family obligations. also she was named after her grandmother. so this act of changing her name looked from the outside like an act of spite, like a lot of things she does. her mother felt as if she was being pushed away emotionally, while still having to help with everything physical.
i will respect everyone's chosen name on instinct, but questions like this one brings painful memories.
i emailed all my meps in regard to this a few months ago, and charlie weimers was the only one who responded. his claim was that "SD has been against chat control from the start".
this is not something people outside the us reflect on. it's a common trope that us-americans go to europe to find their roots and whatever and nobody understands what they even mean by that.
my theory is that he simply assumes nothing bad will happen from any situation until someone tells him otherwise. i will give him this though, he instantly changes his opinion when presented with new data.
i think the official stance of the henson company is that "they don't exist below the waist"