Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L
Posts
0
Comments
262
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Is that supposed to be the strange insult?

  • Oh man I don't enjoy being that guy right now but for the love of all, It's CUSTOMERS. Costumers are people who work in dress-up.

    I've only seen this in the past few years, but it's become such a common mistake. I don't understand it.

    Sorry, I mean you're making a salient point about the lack of a license and all. Even so, if he's been caring for the squirrel domestically for seven years, where do they think the supposed rabies would have come from? It doesn't just manifest.

  • Is anyone else bothered that there are two number ones and one number two represented?

  • "Rational thoughts"

    "A vote for a third party candidate in an election with two viable candidates doesn't benefit the party I'm least aligned with."

    Choose one. Both can't be true.

    Ah, shit, I forgot... you lot are awful at understanding how binary decisions work.

  • "I'm doing things that make it easier for the Trump regime to take power, but you're the problem."

    Great stance.

  • There are two viable choices.

  • Shit, and all this time I thought he just had a passion for entertaining!

  • Nah, chief. There are only two viable candidates in most of our presidential elections due to how the system is set up.

    But keep making shit up and spewing nonsense for the next few days. Momma always said "stick with what you're good at."

  • Just know if Trump wins, you very well might not get that option.

  • Just a small, pointless nitpick that doesn't matter, but made me smile because of the implication:

    It should be "home turf" not "home terf". But the latter is probably just as true as the former.

  • Because people like this have no platform. They have no plan. They screech and wail, as if caterwauling is panacea.

    "Fix the climate!"

    "End homelessness!"

    "Stop the genocide!"

    But when pressed as to how to effect these changes, they almost invariably resort to maligning your morals, denigrating your doubts, and calumniating your civility.

  • Wherever he is, he can fucking stay there.

  • That's not a bad point. We consider what Maine and Nebraska have implemented as proportional, but it isn't truly. It's a better system than WTA, but it still essentially nullifies a significant number of votes.

  • Now do the same for the only other viable candidate in this election.

  • Oh! Oh I've seen this one in another thread!

    "I wouldn't vote for either of them."

    That's not an option in this exercise, you have to pick one or the other.

    "I don't see why I'd have to choose. I pick neither."

    Again, that wasn't the question. Harris or Trump are the only acceptable answers. If you have to choose one, which would it be?

    That's how the exchange generally went. It shone a really nice spotlight on the ridiculous mindset at play.

  • "Take a look at this video, which should convince all of you that trying to convince individuals is a failing effort."

    Do you even read what you post?

  • "My moral values allow me to vote against my best interests and the welfare of anyone who doesn't align with the christofascist right. I have such a difficult time with concepts like "logical thinking" and "cause and effect" that I can rationalize such a terrible decision and even pretend that I'm the solution!"

  • Are you voting for the only other viable candidate?

    No?

    Then you're supporting the GOP.