Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.”
goog chief legal just being an edgelord while undermining some small things like uhhh... goog being under beck and call of an orange baby.
he didn't really define what's "best technologies" are -- in the world.
we can say COBOL is still alive because it is the "best technology" at what it can do.
i think the venezuelan budget is just way below 1% of us that we can easily say it is pure bullying. the other factors would be location and the lack of nearby potential adversity.
yes. in a way that i care about probable misrepresentation of content
Did clickbait make you stop seeing some creator?
it made me avoid some creators
Did you use youtube but clickbait (among other things) made you to stop using it’s platform?
it made me aware of how youtube and its content creators make use of it. it also made me aware of other video platforms out there.
Do you think clickbait is the major of the YouTube’s problems?
no. it is just part of a combo of ads, generic/saturated content and privacy concerns
Do you see something good in clickbait among the bad things? Like, which ones?
i think it is a sign of saturation. like how shops have hawkers to get people in and browse. the bad thing of course, is misrepresentation and maybe a waste of people's time
Could we see clickbait as a necessary evil?
it is bad, and it is driven by money. but if the majority of people don't fall for it then there might be a chance for clickbaits to use a better method to get attention.
they peek and poke?