The fediverse itself. It made quite the rounds on the grapevine for a few months. During their moment of simping for Israel in the Palestine conflict, Germany passed a law regarding “Nazi Exceptionalism” too, that basically punishes people for suggesting anyone could even try to be as evil as Nazis were, and was largely part of the rationale.

feddit.org

Be mindful that that is a Germany-based right-wingoid cesspit that supports and excuses the Israel genocide of Palestinians, all under the guise that “legally they can’t ever be as evil as us, the Nazis”.

Mobile

Heck no. Even if the app was the best available, it’s got to live in an environment that is already sending everything to Google / Apple and trying to whine about nudes where it can, maybe to send them to the Pedophile Elite.

Only if I had something like a Graphene phone, but with the prices incumbent in their current Motorola deal, that’s about a decade away.

Going outside? In this economy?

This is like the Blip!

and I’m certain they don’t check for nearby children

What??? Why wouldn’t they check for nearby children? Israel loves two things: doing genocides and killing children. How else are they going to keep the score? Gotta make the number go up!

This is one of the many showcases of how AI is “not like any other technology”. A knife is constructed in such a way that using it to cut comes natural. Making a wheel turn on a road feels natural.

Now do the same but with “invented a child bombing machine” or “rape machine”, for the people who are annoyingly dense and tone-deaf.

That’s not all it is. The how of the it is also important.

fair

18 to 21 years: the time a person born today when I register the work, will have to wait until becoming an adult member of society who ought to be able to work for society and thus be able to consume my creation on their own terms, not constrained by a “mandate” or a “license”.

Hopefully fewer than the ones who will fork because of the pro-AI voting.

Not necessarily. No one says you can’t just use the latest commit to the Linux kernel (or any other software) before it became slopified.

Honestly this would be the expected effect if one understand what Reddit even is in the first place: an aggregator.

The “correct” (or “more correct”) thing to do would be to mirror reddit’s links to the author’s/creator’s webpage / service in the post, so that the people who can respond to the creator can, and the people who want to just talk about the thing linked, also can.

And, given that Reddit now restricts visiting without being logged in, the only “practical” way to even get some of the links there is for someone else to mirror them into the Fediverse anyway.

Do you really not understand concepts such as “necessary but not sufficient”? Just because I don’t like strawberry juice doesn’t mean I have to dislike all strawberries (or all juices).

Or are you trying to sell AIs for someone else?

Come on, be honest.

Not really. What, you expect me to be mad at the wheelbarrow?

Geez, the low meda literacy and the silly arguments of absurdum from the people who try everything to sell a cage for which they don’t have the keys is unprecedented.

And as much of who holds the keys, who places the locks is also important. Having all the keys to the kingdom of freedom is only useful after we have removed all the minefields from all the roads leadin gthere.

The main issue is DNSSEC - with it, negative answers are authoritative and signed, so they’d need to stop supporting DNSSEC altogether to restore the record.

Makes sense to me. Technologies and laws have to be graded in terms of who they hit negatively. if DNSSEC can be used to censor and erase people on a toddler’s whim, then it’s perhaps best that it’s removed, or that it’s at least temporarily dropped for cases like this.

It sounds like you are mad at our economic and societal structures, but taking your anger out on the tools.

I can be mad at both the exploitative structures and at the toolkits that enable, further and synthetize them. They don’t need to be mutually exclusive, and in general it’s not useful that they are.

Oh look it’s the same accelerationist argument as usual, that just because you loathe one technology you must throw away all of them.

Try at least high-school grade of discussion.

You need to divorce your thinking

I already did, but you refuse to read it. I explicitly said this is about how A (or what people call “AI”, because it certainly has not existed for “around for 50 years now”) exist in this world how we have created it. Via theft, exploitation and destruction, and oriented to the fulfillment of the elites and the oppression of the worker class.

Absolutism is toxic, yes. Moderated realism upon a flagrant observation of reality as conducted, is not.