Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
1
Comments
261
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • It is basically instantaneous on my 12 year old Keppler GPU Linux Box.

    It depends on what the website admin sets, but I've had checks take more than 20 seconds on my reasonably modern phone. And as scrapers get more ruthless, that difficulty setting will have to go up.

    The Cryptography happening is something almost all browsers from the last 10 years can do natively that Scrapers have to be individually programmed to do. Making it several orders of magnitude beyond impractical for every single corporate bot to be repurposed for.

    At best these browsers are going to have some efficient CPU implementation. Scrapers can send these challenges off to dedicated GPU farms or even FPGAs, which are an order of magnitude faster and more efficient. This is also not complex, a team of engineers could set this up in a few days.

    Only to then be rendered moot, because it's an open-source project that someone will just update the cryptographic algorithm for.

    There might be something in changing to a better, GPU resistant algorithm like argon2, but browsers don't support those natively so you would rely on an even less efficient implementation in js or wasm. Quickly changing details of the algorithm in a game of whack-a-mole could work to an extent, but that would turn this into an arms race. And the scrapers can afford far more development time than the maintainers of Anubis.

    These posts contain links to articles, if you read them you might answer some of your own questions and have more to contribute to the conversation.

    This is very condescending. I would prefer if you would just engage with my arguments.

  • On the contrary, I'm hoping for a solution that is better than this.

    Do you disagree with any part of my assessment? How do you think Anubis will work long term?

  • I get that website admins are desperate for a solution, but Anubis is fundamentally flawed.

    It is hostile to the user, because it is very slow on older hardware andere forces you to use javascript.

    It is bad for the environment, because it wastes energy on useless computations similar to mining crypto. If more websites start using this, that really adds up.

    But most importantly, it won't work in the end. These scraping tech companies have much deeper pockets and can use specialized hardware that is much more efficient at solving these challenges than a normal web browser.

  • He knows that peacefully voting is the only way to bring down the fascist Trojans.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • If a government is fighting for survival while it has a bunch of horrible weapons lying around like I described, they are absolutely going to use them. No question about it. That's why you should ban the development and production of these things even in peacetime and that's why international treaties are so important.

  • I told you to get lost and yet here you are still telling me that my lived experience is incorrect actually. Yes everyone forgets things sometimes, but ADHD and executive dysfunction means it happens more often and also it's more difficult to deal with even when you do remember. Maybe go read up on those things because you are now blocked.

    • Not everyone has access to treatment
    • Even with treatment, these things are still much harder than for neurotypical people
    • Even with treatment and great effort, you will still just slip up sometimes and fail at these things at a higher rate than neurotypical people.

    So the point still stands.

  • Coming into a community to gatekeep our experience is very disruptive. Please stop.

    I could go into detail about why the ADHD condition actually does make it much harder to deal with stuff like subscriptions, but frankly you are not entitled to an explanation.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Your premise is that these countries have a binary choice between either using mines in a "responsible" way or be conquered by Russia which uses mines in a bad way.

    This is a fallacy because there are in fact many other plausible outcomes:

    • Using mines is not necessary to repel a Russian attack. Russia is currently very weakened by its war in Ukraine and NATO has significantly more material and spending (even without the US). It's totally possible to work towards peace without resorting to these barbaric weapons.
    • It's theoretically possible that a country uses mines and still gets conquered. Mines aren't as useful as they were 100 years ago.
    • It is unlikely that this country would only use mines in a "responsible" way as you describe. Armies do extreme things when faced with an invasion and any such reservations will quickly be cast aside if it provides a strategic advantage.
  • Not disappear entirely, but most households won't own desktop computers or HDDs.

  • Deleted

    Clutter bunny

    Jump
  • How hard could it be to find a picture of someone washing the dishes, without turning to the lying machine?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Chemical warfare? Cluster munitions? Bombing of population centers?

    The point of international law on warfare is that they apply to everyone regardless of circumstances. What you're suggesting is war crimes in self-defense.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That's clearly a false dichotomy.

  • I can fix her

  • Removed

    Alligator Auschwitz

    Jump
  • That is insane.