Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)K
Posts
1
Comments
261
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • "there is no valid argument [...] for [...] taxing suppressors"

    This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.

  • Breaking an NDA (allegedly) is civil, not criminal

  • Do delivery drivers in NYC really use cars? 🤨

  • I think I would rather lick Technetium than Lithium

  • I love the fact that you drew this by hand

  • That's the thing: if he went by Womble at work then that was his name. The fact that the government called him Raymond doesn't make that his only name, they are both valid.

  • Fun fact, you can use whatever names you want. All names are made up. Your "legal name" is just what the government calls you, but you can ask other people to call you something else entirely. The same goes with pronouns.

  • Many EU countries have their own different laws about this stuff. The GDPR likely does not apply here because of the exception for "purely personal and household activities", article 2(2)(c).

  • Incomprehensible, I love it

  • I have no doubt that FIFA bribes everyone, including Trump. It's just in this particular instance that, if it was their intent to bribe Trump with a trophy, they would have created a second one with real gold instead of giving Chelsea a replica. It seems much more likely that Trump just stole it and FIFA didn't raise a stink about it in order to preserve relations.

  • Why not present that context to users and let us draw our own conclusions?

  • If it works it works. You mathematicians just don't understand the pragmatics. What is tech debt?

  • It clearly doesn't make sense that the FIFA would spend a small fortune on creating a trophy, only to give the winner a replica. It is concerning to me that you still take Trump's word at face value, no matter how obvious and self-serving the lie.

  • Just more proof that the universe is flat

  • They are both a problem. Cars took up most walkable areas and now venture capitalists are exploiting what little is left by littering it with their electric scooters and bikes. Rentals are an important part of a mobility strategy, but they should be run by the government and get their own parking infrastructure.

  • Künstliche Intelligenz 😔

  • If you're deliberately belittling me I won't engage. Goodbye.

  • "You criticize society yet you participate in it. Curious."

  • To be clear, I am not minimizing the problems of scrapers. I am merely pointing out that this strategy of proof-of-work has nasty side effects and we need something better.

    These issues are not short term. PoW means you are entering into an arms race against an adversary with bottomless pockets that inherently requires a ton of useless computations in the browser.

    When it comes to moving towards something based on heuristics, which is what the developer was talking about there, that is much better. But that is basically what many others are already doing (like the "I am not a robot" checkmark) and fundamentally different from the PoW that I argue against.

    Go do heuristics, not PoW.