Yea it seems like a lot people don't want to face the fact that US politics are a theatre drama. And of course they also presume that you're implying that means one shouldn't vote, indeed a dangeous (and irritating) assumption. I believe one should vote based on a politicians actions and character, and try to notice when they're bought and performing. The preponderance of evidence that anyone with any power is bought out is defeaning.
Yes I understand and would not discourage voting. Its currently the only way to have any influence at all. Whole system needs to be turned over for anything to meaningfully change; vote as much as possible and get thoroughly educated, just don't expect politicians to do anything helpful when they're already owned by money.
Oh my, yes, you are correct. That was sort of knee jerk, as opposed to it being the reporting party's burden somehow. I simply cannot understand the legal gymnastics needed to punish your customers for this sort of thing; I'm tired but I feel like this is not exactly an uncommon occurrence. Anyways let us all learn from my mistake and do not be rash and curtail your own freedoms.
So in a just world, google would be heavily penalized for not only allowing csam on their servers, but also for violating their own tos with a customer?
It occurs to me that I'd argue we're heading towards a forced scarcity society rather than post scarcity. That's the only way they can make sure we don't get a Star Trek type future if/when we figure out fusion power. Hell, we've already basically been able to feed everyone for ages.
The ringer, dude! Its my dirty undies!