The author's credentials do not indicate any professional scientific training. Their only professional affiliation is the "institute" that they founded and has no other apparent membership. There are three manuscripts associated with their ORCID, all single-author with the same affiliation above. Two of those manuscripts have definitely not passed peer review, the third likely has not either but it's not immediately clear. On the institute's website the author is called a "revelation philosopher". This PowerPoint graphic claims to explain their theory https://siel.global/assets/images/image01.jpg?v=6b7feba2
Any one of these things would be a red flag for scientific legitimacy. Together they are a recipe for pseudoscientific nonsense
Interesting. This feels like a variant of EMDR which is a pretty well-known therapy but isn't mentioned in the article
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/22641-emdr-therapy