My guess is they want the primary button to always be on the right side. For a first time visitor that primary action is always to create an account. If the user is a return visitor, they assume the user already has an account and so they want the primary action to be to login to that account.
I take it some UX-er got paid handsomely, but I think all it does is confuse people. As someone suggested already, I'd just go for login/register and make login primary (since you only register once, and login maybe hundreds of times after that)
Zou natuurlijk oliedom zijn om een wet die ziet op het verbieden van activiteiten tijdens een specifieke jaarlijkse gebeurtenis precies ten tijde van die gebeurtenis in te laten gaan. Das vragen om rare edge cases zoals deze.
If you want to sidestep firefox, all firefox descendants would eventually pose the same problem. So I think many options others provided are suboptimal in that regard.
That's not at all the same logic. Yes, cars can go way above speed limits. And there are use cases where cars need to have more power (driving uphill for example). But this is about an autopilot specifically programmed/instructed to actually go above speed limits, and going above speed limits is illegal. So the setting in itself is illegal. Having the technical ability to go above speed limits is not. If the driver chooses to use that ability and go above speed limits, it's illegal again. This is not rocket science.
Henley & Partners. Who - in a totally unrelated matter of course - netted almost 56 million euros off of scummy people like Russian oligarchs by helping them get Maltese 'Golden passports', a program ruled illegal by the European Court of Justice in part due to leaked documents from Henley & Partners itself.
How about the Greek question mark: ; I still need to find an opportune moment to prank some collegues with that one.