Tbh if you’re not meowing on the emergency frequency, then are you really meowing?
- 60 Posts
- 51 Comments
Believe it or not I have this meme from 2023
Sorry for not having it on hand, and thanks for finding it!
This is fucking diabolical and 100% accurate
Sorry, thank you!
I can do anything!
I got flashed in the train unfortunately
Went ahead and just sent more memes to clear out the timeline
JoJo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
World News@lemmy.world•ICE Shoots Minneapolis Observer in the headEnglish
11·4 months agoI’m not American
I’m just waiting until y’all either to implode into civil war or decide to wipe this shitstain off the planet earth
I don’t need to fucking deal with this; clean up your mess, or we’ll probably meet in The Hague, one way or another
JoJo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
World News@lemmy.world•ICE Shoots Minneapolis Observer in the headEnglish
11·4 months agoWell, you’re not succeeding at solidarity, have fun.
JoJo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
World News@lemmy.world•ICE Shoots Minneapolis Observer in the headEnglish
96·4 months agoYou’d be having a bigger effect being angry on Twitter then, instead of (effectively) incentivising infighting in a social media predominantly inhabited by the people who are opposing all of these atrocities
You’re doing a real good job of making me go “idgaf about Americans” with this non-solidarity, because from what I’m seeing you’re only driving people (with similar interests) away that could join in opposition to trump
JoJo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
World News@lemmy.world•ICE Shoots Minneapolis Observer in the headEnglish
239·4 months agoI hope you’re happy with trump, then, because apparently you want to be.
As with everything, consenting adults make any court case between two people effectively null, unless the state asserts its authority (as is with certain types of injury), and/or when it pertains to other people (when person A tries to tell person C that they own person B, and such try to claim control of various processes, etc.)
I’d be interested in how much the law would allow or understand those cases, or in which cases the state is allowed (without either party filing claims) to step in by itself. (Which there’s a specific word for, but I forgot it)
JoJo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
World News@lemmy.world•US will require EU citizens to give all biometric data including DNA in new ESTA requirementsEnglish
28·5 months agoIt’s an attempt on intimidation, because supposedly for the person travelling it’s a lose-lose:
- provide all your data, and allow the US government (and any connected entities (big tech)) to use it to track and sell that data
- don’t provide all your data, and when the US government suspects that you did that, they can bar entry for little reason, and/or have legal grounds(/excuse) for go after you
All around it’s a humiliation and intimidation exercise
I love this, this is like a meme microcosm
I don’t have any treatment, actually
It’s a curse
It puts my brain to 150% processing and I just wanna listen to one conversation and aaaaaa
Even when I can’t listen to the dozens of voices due to them being nearly inaudible it still enables the part of my brain to try to decode them, so about 75% is used to try to listen to words that I don’t even wanna listen to
This is why ANC is heaven



Then these things are not allowed on the road, full stop.
If they’re not respecting traffic rules, they’re not abiding by the law, and so they’re legally not allowed.