Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
8
Joined
3 yr. ago

Sorry about that.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • The issue is what mechanism could be used to force Google to pay, but also prevents Google from saying "yeah, we just won't provide any links to those sites at all".

    Are they going to force Google to index those sites against their will? If so, how? Even if they could, would you really want that? Will it be just as cool for Russia to force Google to index whatever it wants, too? Are they just going to take money from Google no matter what, and give it to the news sites, even if Google isn't indexing them?

    Sorry for the delayed response. I didn't see a notification.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Google is pointing out that the news sites need google more than google needs the news sites.

    This sort of thing happens every once in a while; some country's news organizations think that google should have to pay them for the privilege of helping people find their sites. Google responds by blacklisting news sites from that country. The news sites suffer more than google does, and they reverse the decision.

  • The best we can hope for, under the circumstances, is that Roberts comes to deeply regret that decision, as Trump turns on him.

  • I don't think you've fully realized what is going on. The message Trump is sending is "if you do my bidding, there will be no consequences". The law is now a tool to protect those people Trump wants protected, and a weapon to hurt those Trump wants hurt.

    Classic fascism. Buckle up.

  • My wife had a guy start at her company the same day she did, but he got fired that same day because for reasons no one understands he decided it would be wise to make his Teams (or whatever they used. Slack? I can't remember) profile picture a meme that said "Epstein didn't kill himself" or something to that effect.

    It was a six figure software engineering job, too. I cannot imagine losing a job like that for such a silly, self-inflicted reason.

  • Your cynicism isn't properly calibrated.

    If you look at the viewpoint of a CEO, you'll see that they would be chomping at the bit to get rid of as many high paying technical or administrative roles as they can; it's not like that extra money is going to flow down the chain.

    Now, if there were a threat of LLMs replacing a management position, that would be a different story.

    Edit: Apparently my reading comprehension is what needs calibrating. Turns out I agree! My bad.

  • Well, TIL a few things. Thanks.

  • I have to admit that I always thought she was agnostic, if not atheist, from that Pope stuff.

    I idly wonder why a gay feminist would convert to Islam. Aren't those things incompatible? Is this my ignorance showing? Are there sects of Islam that are more open minded, like there are sects of Christianity?