13542 in the original doesn’t even make a star
- 2 Posts
- 132 Comments
jcg@halubilo.socialto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•It is even possible to "imitate" the voice of a fictional character without AI?9·13 days agoIt’s almost like OP had learned about AI impressions before hearing that impressions have been a thing for far longer than we’ve had AI to imitate voices. No judgement here, just fascinating.
jcg@halubilo.socialto Programming@programming.dev•Computer specs for compilation times?21·14 days agoCompilation is CPU bound and, depending on what language mostly single core per compilation unit (I.e. in LLVM that’s roughly per file, but incremental compilations will probably only touch a file or two at a time, so the highest benefit will be from higher single core clock speed, not higher core count). So you want to focus on higher clock speed CPUs.
Also, high speed disks (NVME or at least a regular SSD) gives you performance gains for larger codebases.
“oooh yeah play with my testes a little bit”
It’s the social permission to say homosexual things without being a homosexual for me
jcg@halubilo.socialto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•"Sad thing to be, nonsensical thing to want to be" 💔🥀💔🥀42·29 days agoI suppose you can’t blame your earlier dentists, though. How were they supposed to know? And if they automatically treated redheads differently, would that be racism?
I occasionally lecture my 3DPD wife about science facts and she hates it. She’ll say things like “what?” And “I was just asking what we should do for dinner”
We still don’t talk sometimes
I think the main barriers are context length (useful context. GPT-4o has “128k context” but it’s mostly sensitive to the beginning and end of the context and blurry in the middle. This is consistent with other LLMs), and just data not really existing. How many large scale, well written, well maintained projects are really out there? Orders of magnitude less than there are examples of “how to split a string in bash” or “how to set up validation in spring boot”. We might “get there”, but it’ll take a whole lot of well written projects first, written by real humans, maybe with the help of AI here and there. Unless, that is, we build it with the ability to somehow learn and understand faster than humans.
People seem to disagree but I like this. This is AI code used responsibly. You’re using it to do more, without outsourcing all your work to it and you’re actively still trying to learn as you go. You may not be “good at coding” right now but with that mindset you’ll progress fast.
jcg@halubilo.socialto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.3·2 months agoNot what I’d have expected. In my company it’s mostly higher ups (suits) pushing the stuff and workers begrudgingly implementing it.
jcg@halubilo.socialto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.1·2 months agodeleted by creator
jcg@halubilo.socialto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.3·2 months agoHow high up in the corporate ladder are they?
jcg@halubilo.socialto Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•They're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.8·2 months agoAs a former script kiddie myself I think it’s not much different from how I used to blindly copy and paste code snippets from tutorials. Well, environmental impact aside. Those who have the drive and genuine interest will actually come to learn things properly. Those who don’t should stay tf out of production code, it’s already bad enough. Which is why we genuinely shouldn’t let “vibe coding” be legitimized.
jcg@halubilo.socialto DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml•My journey towards more European, open source, privacy-oriented, and decentralized alternatives4·2 months agoIt’s a pretty big jump to go from ChatGPT/LeChat to hosting your own LLM locally, if you want results that are anywhere close to the commercial offerings. Both of them even have a free tier that would probably still be better than anything you could run locally without significant hardware investment. It’s definitely not difficult these days, but it’s very expensive to get close results unless you’ve already got the hardware.
It’s typically pronounced Tai/Dai in Japanese (大成功, daiseiko, 大変, taihen), or “oo” in the case of 大きい/大きな (ookii/ookina).
Do you not reuse any part of your outfit from day to day? Like do you have at least 7 different pairs of pants that you cycle through? Cause that’s why I wouldn’t do this, I’d rather not go out with some clothes then bring all that outside dirt into my bed.
I think many pawns, perhaps even most pawns, stay pawns their entire life. And that’s always been good enough for them.
We declare children as dependents legally, don’t we?
You should give Claude Code a shot if you have a Claude subscription. I’d say this is where AI actually does a decent job: picking up human slack, under supervision, not replacing humans at anything. AI tools won’t suddenly be productive enough to employ, but I as a professional can use it to accelerate my own workflow. It’s actually where the risk of them taking jobs is real: for example, instead of 10 support people you can have 2 who just supervise the responses of an AI.
But of course, the Devil’s in the detail. The only reason this is cost effective is because of VC money subsidizing and hiding the real cost of running these models.