Icelandic: very very far top left.
- 1 Post
- 257 Comments
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•I want a boyfriend, but I feel like I don't deserve to have one, and I keep alternating between those two thoughts which is making me feel confused. Is this normal?131·8 days agoThe whole notion of “deserve” here is nothing more than a silly story we tell ourselves because other people teach us to believe it. It’s real, but you can change it. So maybe try changing it.
Instead of “I deserve a boyfriend” or “I don’t deserve a boyfriend”, try thinking “This is just a dumb story. It doesn’t mean anything. I either have a boyfriend or I don’t. That’s it.” Maybe it changes something in you. Maybe it doesn’t. Maybe it takes time and many repetitions. It doesn’t cost much to try.
Peace.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•"Can i ask you for a favor?" Is it rude to say no?9·14 days ago“Sorry, I can’t help you.” Why? Because sometimes I hand out random favors, but not today to you.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•“Production” to describe multiplication?5·16 days ago“summation” is also related to summary. All these words are related to reducing a collection of things to a single thing. A sum reduces a collection of numbers to its total. A summary reduces a collection of thoughts to its essence. A summation is effectively a synonym for a summary.
The word multiplication describes the operation applied to each pair of numbers. The word production would refer to the act of multiplying an arbitrary collection of numbers. Just as it would be for addition and summation.
It would fit the pattern.
It looks like Russian uppercase and lowercase to me.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Why is it ok to replace -ed at the end of a word with -t in some cases? For example, why are "vexed" and "vext" both acceptable, but "thrilled" and "thrilt" aren't?14·22 days agoScrabble is not a language game, but instead a spatial and arithmetic game using arbitrary strings of letters. Don’t look to it as a reflexion of the state of English as she is spoke.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Can you read and understand this passage?21·1 month agoThanks for that. Indeed, that makes me less confident in their suitability to teach those subjects, but I worry about a sensational conclusion about their general literacy.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Can you read and understand this passage?11·1 month agoI would want to repeat that study with novels written in the past 25 years before concluding too much. Yes, the participants had access to a dictionary, but I imagine that needing to decipher certain parts, such as foreign cultural references and familiar words with unexpected meanings, interferes with the brain’s usual functions for turning words into images in the mind’s eye. And this even ignores the folks with aphantasia like me.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Can you read and understand this passage?5·1 month agoYes, although I’m struck by some of the words, particularly this sense of “wonderful”.
And now I’m even more glad that it’s sunny out here right now and I can hear birds.
Maritime Madness, Candied Habanero or Lime Cilantro.
Political discussions online rarely lead to satisfying resolutions. As a result, political discussions bleed into everyday discussion in the desperate hope that something, somewhere, will magically make sense.
Similarly, when businesses have meetings that don’t actually resolve matters, every meeting becomes a desperate chance to discuss things that matter in the hopes they’ll be resolved, so then every meeting that needs to happen will happen during every scheduled meeting, even wrhb ostensibly unrelated. This continues until meeting culture changes and even overall communication culture changes.
It seems natural and reasonable in such an environment for many people (like you) to want to disengage. Why continue doing something that never seems to lead to resolution?
deleted by creator
I am quite familiar with the verbs. Thanks.
My original joke was based on the assumption that “She lay” was intended to be in the present tense (and why wouldn’t it be?) and therefore a humorous use of colloquial English (in place of “she lays”, possibly invoking African American English for humorous effect. We can argue about whether this is culturally sensitive.). The corresponding correction would therefore be “She lie”, rather than the grammatically standard “She lies”.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto politics @lemmy.world•Trump appoints Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as top prosecutor in DC1·2 months agoI find your moderation decision in this case quite cowardly. Yes, I read the rules.
“snuck” is perfectly fine, as long as that’s what you’ve heard since birth. 🤷
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How do alone people find each other online?14·2 months agoYou did it. Count me among the folks who would reply to you.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto politics @lemmy.world•Trump appoints Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as top prosecutor in DC4·2 months agoThis exactly is my point.
Yes, we can’t identify which grain of sand makes it a beach, and yet it eventually becomes a beach.
Yes. It didn’t sound past tense in my head, but that certainly fits.
And no: “she lie” would be a colloquial present tense assuming that “she lay” was a similar colloquial conjugation of the verb “to lay” as commonly used in place of “to lie”.
Watching the fire in the hearth, no?