Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J
Posts
2
Comments
108
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • how can we know that in this particular instance they do exist? If this were a reliable way to get someone expelled without any evidence, then if I were a bully I'd accuse other people of making deepfakes of me.

  • I hardly use sms at all

  • So am I misunderstanding or is the problem that the set of "victims of communism" setminus the set of all fascists is too small and fuzzy to be a Schelling point people can agree on?

  • delet, tlush pituk! I love these Chinook jargon words, though the cheechakos don't seem to be picking them up these days.

  • looks like they couldn't get along. Nothing to do with their politics being different.

  • lover's quarrel

  • Let's be real, even if the dems come back into power that's not going to magically heal everything.

  • Start conservatively, and ban only things which are bright-line social media. Then expand if this isn't enough.

  • Well we should define it sensibly. It's not the bigger problem.

  • Yes. But it's not easy for parents apparently. Indeed, there's a coordination problem -- while the standard is for kids to have social media, removing social media for one child disconnects them from their peers. So standardising the ban would be needed.

  • I think we should just ban social media entirely. If people want to stay in touch with each other, it should be through direct messaging (including email); and if people want to publish their opinions to the world let them use blogs; and if people want to discuss topics, let them use forums.

    Conveniently, if social media is banned, then we don't need ID verification.

  • Routers is not the way. It should be device-side. Children's phones and computers should blacklist social media, or even whitelist allowed sites IMO. Otherwise they can get around this with data, or public wi-fi.

  • You're welcome. We are upset with the USA, not Americans.

  • Damn I didn't know it was that high here.

  • True, I just assumed that your first and second sentenced were in juxtaposition.

  • Is that bad somehow?

  • True, though they are better educated, more socialist, and import less American politics. I daresay this causes them to elect better leaders.

  • That's valid. My preference is for device-side child locks. For instance, a header that says, "I am a child." There is much to improve there still. But failing that, if the winds of politics dictate we must have verification -- why not ZKP?

  • Well, that same problem exists with many of the proposed verification models, like credit cards (how can you verify this is my credit card?) , photo ID, etc.

    Here's my proposal: your browser can send a request to a verification body (could be the government directly, let's say) to respond to the challenge from the website you're accessing, without sending information about which website is asking for the challenge. The verifier sends a cryptographically-signed approval back. The browser forwards this to the website. To prevent comparisons of timing as a deanonymization method, the browser can wait a random period of time before forwarding the request both ways.

  • United States | News & Politics @lemmy.ml

    Coast Guard disputes claim new guidelines no longer consider swastikas hate symbols

    www.independent.co.uk /news/world/americas/us-politics/coast-guard-swastika-hate-symbol-guidelines-b2869435.html
  • Games @lemmy.world

    Legendary game designer, programmer, Space Invaders champion, and LGBTQ trailblazer Rebecca Heineman has died

    www.pcgamer.com /gaming-industry/legendary-game-designer-programmer-space-invaders-champion-and-lgbtq-trailblazer-rebecca-heineman-has-died/