Recently my research lead recounted a meeting among the senior people, where they hammered out a bunch of project pitches. Some of the wording was still a little rough, but they were going to pass it all through DeepL anyway, to make it read good. Also everyone's bad at spellling these days, since you got a thing that autocompletes for you, right? They were proud they remembered how to spell "continuous".
Sure, everyone has days they can't word good, but this starts sounding like worrying de-skilling. These people spend a good portion of their paid time working on and arguing over wording.
Ich kanns gerade nicht sagen.
Ich finds schwierig wieviele Bilder mittlerweile in die Kategorie "könnte fake sein, gibt aber keine Beweise" fallen. Gleich kommt bestimmt einer mit "das ist ein klassischer KI-Stil, 100% fake, ich kenn mich da aus", aber das find auch nicht wirklich empirisch.