Skip Navigation

Posts
7
Comments
4549
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

    What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

    Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

  • That was before copyleft was a thing. Many European governments are now requiring tax funded software to be copyleft.

    There are exceptions to that law, such as the USPS. Sounds like we need to contact our legislators to get the law updated

    Licensing CC0 is just subsidizing corporations at the expense of tax payers. It should be copyleft because it was funded publicly

  • It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

    What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

    Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

  • Ah, but for just one time I would take the Northwest Passage

  • Nah, that law was written before copyleft licenses were widespread. There are exemptions for contractors and some groups like USPS.

    I'm saying that law is wrong, and it needs to be changed.

  • It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

    What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

    Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

  • CC0 = gift to corporations at the expense of taxpayers

    Copyleft = everyone owns it and all derivatives, even from corporations

  • It means that any company can take that code, modify it (as would be required every year per IRS tax changes), and resell it without being required to publish the source code changes.

    What many European countries are doing is requiring the government to publish code under a copyleft license. That would allow companies to also benefit from this code to make their own tools (which they could also sell), and it would require them to publish the source code of their improvements.

    Basically copyleft legally ensures collaboration. Public domain does not.

  • A copyleft would absolutely be appropriate here.

    It was paid for with public funds.

  • It doesn't matter what OP likes. We shouldn't be linking to inaccessible content on Lemmy. That's low effort posting that harms our communities.

  • Jesus we need to change that law. The US is so far behind the EU..

    Edit: looks like USPS is exempted from that law. We should probably exempt IRS too.

  • You're telling me the government is legally barred from using a copy left license?!?

    Source?

  • Yes. The US is not a democracy.

    Most politicians also don't get support for >50% of their constituency

  • Take a picture showing that it's raining outside.

    Caption the picture "it's raining"

  • i can had unprotected sex with multiple strangers now?