

Or Sweden?
I wonder how many of these are actually member-owned cooperatives
Or Sweden?
I wonder how many of these are actually member-owned cooperatives
Unfortunately I dont have a subscription to StreamBerry
Is that a bad thing?
Peak chad is when you build your own open source tractor
Soon they’ll just tap into your partner and make them speak ads throughout the day.
Nice. There was one of these in Berlin too.
I mean healthy foods are exempt from sales tax.
So it must be implicit that they’ll only tax unnecessary/unhealthy groceries like alcohol, tobacco, candy, eggs, and meat. I dont see a problem with this. We should be taxing these things anyway. But I wish the funds would be used directly to lower the cost of healthy foods like rice, beans, vegetables, fruits, flour, oats, etc
You dont have to buy new. Go to a thrift store and buy used if you have nothing lying around.
There’s loads of Jewish Arabs. And there has been loads anti-zionist Jews since Hertzel. Again, stop falling into antisemetic propaganda that’s spread by Israel. Israel doesn’t speak for Jews.
The issue is, and had always been, between Zionists and Palestinians.
Stop with the antisemitism.
Be a better neighbor and start building hiding spaces in your walls now.
Expanding*
The US had had them for decades.
Aipac isnt Jewish. They’re Zionist.
There’s more christian Zionists than Jewish Zionists.
And loads of Jews are anti-zionist. Don’t fall for US antisemetic propaganda. Know the difference between Jews and Zionists
Are they accepting refugees?
I think ovaries are more important here
Well, it was about growth. So I guess he transitioned to female at the end of the film.
All governments want this. Everywhere.
The difference is where the people allow it and they don’t.
US has contracted out to Palentier for years. This isnt new.
I guess you’re new here, but we learned over 10 years ago that the NSA had a goal of targeting literally everyone.
What’s new is that the power is shifting from groups like the FBI and NSA to ICE.
Why wouldn’t they vote on a motion that *is" binding?