Oh, you're right. The google-guy waltzes right in alongside yourself. Doesn't bother waiting outside to listen. And to disallow him entry is rocket science mixed with slapstick idiocracy.
Lucky my do i know how to load a CustomRoms.
You re right. The depiction of google is a bit off.
Deviation from the norm of course is (afaik) the main driver of evolution. The chaotic approach. Trying out gene variations and sometimes stumbling upon a advantageous evolutionary trait. Is this about right?
Because of their diversity humankind was able to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Diversity is a survival trait of humankind.
At least it was for a long time. I am not sure how much this is true in the modern world
Oh don't worry, sry. I was kind of a over-dramatisatising. Like "wanting this hellish and cruel torture of devillish corporations in symbiosis with mass ignorance to end".
Sry, i didn't think about s/o worrying about my state of mind. I'm ok. Thanks though for minding...
Sry, but afaik there are some flaws with this hypothesis. Neurodivergence is no defined Illness but a catch-all-term for deviations from the norm. The thing with normality is, nobody really wants to be a normalo, and only very little people fit there. Everyone has his deviations. Neurodivergence refers to mental deviations from the (statistical) norm.
Whether you Like it or not, Person A with schizophrenia and Person B with depression only have in common that they both suffer from a ICD-defined Illness. That aside, theres not much in common between the two.
Calling the ability to be mentally ill, a defining trait of humanity is kind of strange. That would make normal people less human?
I very much like the framing you used here. Words are to communicate about the world and the persons in it. This shouldn't be made unduely difficult and complicated. Individuals wishing a special treatment don't have a right to it, people should still try to respect the (handicapped) persons, with the respect comes a willingness to accomodate their wishes (within reason like with everyone else).
An important detail though ist the differenciation between calling someTHING stupid (action or words) and calling someONE stupid.
Every person has their right to be happy and at peace, everyone needs their self esteem (and this includes people with mental handicaps). Calling them stupid is a quality about them as persons. Calling what they said stupid leaves their quality as a person intact, next time they can choose again.
Someone might inform you about a handicap to explain their behaviour, it doesn't make the shortsighted actions any less shortsighted. But it might help to understand the reasons and limitations of said person.
Actually that ist also put into words how i feel about extreme reactions to someone mislqbeling or misgendering someone else. You can be whatever you like, if it stays reasonable i will accomodate your preferences. If you need me to make a handstand to accomodate your preferences i might choose not to.
Yeah, why should you shy away from being as unfair and mean as our common adversary.
To be frank i'm with @lauha@lemmy.world here. We shouldn't comit the same crimes evil corp ist guilty of. And we should advocate truth and transparency.
Maybe i misunderstood what you mean with microplastic apologist... English isn't my mothertongue.
I wonder why this article afai understand it seems to propagate to be especially careful with the microplastics topic, as if miscommunication is especially dangerous here.
Yeah. I work with mentally i'll people and Everytime my boss uses this heuristic to determine the "truth" i cringe...