Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)J
帖子
1
评论
1209
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Yeah, except that dealing with a legal defense costs a lot of time and money. So even if they can't convict they can use the courts as a means to punish.

    Really shows how much our legal system needs an overhaul to prevent abuse like this.

  • Oh, so that wasn't them quoting him from earlier in the year, he's literally rehashing the weird number of dolls thing?

  • I mean, you also had pretty low quality TV and home media, anything beyond 32 inches wasn't doing much good for you.

  • Either

    These are the sausages of the starship Enterprise.

    Or also from the opening

    To boldly go where no sausage has gone before.

  • I feel like this one is better if you cut it off early:

    It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That's not a sausage.

  • I assume because it's cheaper and easier, but I was surprised to hear that too.

  • Use Google Collab or another web hosted platform. If you're unfamiliar Google Collab is a part of Google docs that you can run Jupyter Notebooks on (and it's free). This avoids the need for anyone to install anything and means you can test materials in the same environment everyone will run against.

    Additionally, Jupyter notebooks makes it easy to add markdown, so instructions can be in stylized format and the students can run the cells over and over again to see how the output changes in real time.

    Lastly, I would lean towards python, but there are many different languages supported in Google Collab and similar web hosted tools.

  • builder.ai has been tricking customers and investors for eight years – selling an advanced code-writing AI that, it turns out, is actually an Indian software farm employing 700 human developers

    跳过
  • It says they'd been tricking investors for 8 years, we'll before ChatGPT. I assume they overpromised in the early years, leveraging labor as a "stopgap" for the developing AI. Then things eventually caught up and they couldn't deliver, leading to the current situation.

    Eight years is a long time, so who was "duped" when can really change the narrative of the headline.

  • I've been saying this for over a decade and it's served me well.

    Its even worse with LLMs, at least an autonomous vehicle has a set functionality, but people are using LLMs to solve all sorts a problems.

  • I don't have any issue with the bottom part of the image, it's the top part that seems to be oblivious to how the world works.

  • You're adding in additional concepts that change the arguement. The original post talks about fences and guarding resources, not about someone taking a cut of other people's work.

    Additionally, even in the self-governance principles mentioned above there is a need for:

    1. Graduated sanctions: Appropriators who violate operational rules are likely to be assessed graduated sanctions (depending on the seriousness and context of the offense) by other appropriators, by officials accountable to these appropriators, or by both.

    You could argue that "sanctions" and "weapons/violence" are separate things, but ultimately even the economists mentioned above call out there is a need for enforcement on how "commons" are used.

    Edit: quotes are from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elinor_Ostrom

  • Isn't the whole point of the "tradegy of the commons" narrative to draw attention to the fact that the "commons" need governance?

    The image you posted seems to be in support of non-goverance, which would be the opposite of what people like Elinor Ostrom advocated.

  • Looking at her work, the first stipulation on pooled resources is:

    Clearly defined boundaries: Individuals or households who have rights to withdraw resource units from the CPR must be clearly defined, as must the boundaries of the CPR itself.

    That seems like she is aware that commons can be misused and simply calling out that societies have found ways to manage them, which in turn kinda refutes the arguement being made in the post.

  • Actually, I'm pretty sure it's the inverse in this instance. There is a lack of faith in the US to repay its debts, so they have to increase the rates to attract buyers.

    Typically, in bad times rates go down as people are clamoring for stable/risk free places to store cash.

    So basically, even though things aren't looking good economy wise, people are still avoiding bonds and so the government has to jack up rates to move bonds. This is tied to some of the crazy moves Trump/Republicans have been making that almost destroyed the US bond market.

  • Yeah, I thought high yield on bonds is bad for the government and means they had to increase rates to intice people to buy them. Meaning Trump is bad for the economy, according to the Treasury.

  • God, I don't need every franchise to have eight TV shows with 1-2 seasons and movies that loosely tie into the TV shows.

  • Yeah, I think it's the combination of things. Breaking personal property is pretty much universally frowned upon, and if he's breaking car windows he was just as likely to hit a person.

    Not sure if that's enough to be deported, but it wouldn't be an outrageous outcome even in the past.

  • Hey, at least they put it in quotes, the way this adimiatration works they'd probably deport the reporter for saying he was racist.